| 查看: 12912 | 回复: 39 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
taoguo2013新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS一审回来一个接受一个拒稿，求助大神我该怎么操作已有16人参与
|
||
|
我第一次投ACCESS，5月14号投稿，31好分配外审专家，18号也就是今天收到决定是拒稿但是鼓励重投，邮件如下： In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your paper once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, we need to reject an article even if it requires minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. Also, note that if a reviewer suggested references, you should only add ones that will make your article better and more complete. Recommending references to specific publications is not appropriate for reviewers and you should report excessive cases to ieeeaccessEIC@ieee.org. NEW: Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE. If the updated manuscript is determined not to have addressed all of the previous reviewers’ concerns during the second peer review, the article will be rejected and no further resubmissions will be allowed. When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript; however include a list of the updates that you made from the previous manuscript in a separate document. The list of updates should have the following regarding each comment: 1) Reviewer’s concern, 2) your response to the concern, 3) actual changes implemented. For grammatical corrections, we kindly request that you highlight all individual changes in the updated manuscript. As an example, you may submit your revised article with the "editing mode" feature turned on. Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request. We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your interest in IEEE Access. 接下来是两个审稿专家的意见： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) 然后给了我6个Specific comments，我初步看了一下，有四个可以修改，还有两个不行但可以大概解释一下。 求问各位大神，我重投的录用的希望大吗？还要不要选择相同的审稿人？是不是还要大约半个月无人认领，然后再审半个月？ 唉，第一次投sci，希望先中一篇保底博士毕业，求助啊  。后面如果重投有结果会在帖子里更新的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
是不是面上基金获得资助最多限三项，大家怎么看
已经有4人回复
-
盲审
已经有5人回复
-
学术会议PPT
已经有5人回复
-
AI派发是根据关键词、基金题目、研究者研究方向匹配？
已经有13人回复
-
关于要不要三战
已经有15人回复
-
解某透露，生命学部的项目质量在评审中明显高于医学部
已经有6人回复
-
大家能不能给点意见啊
已经有30人回复
-
特聘教授，算高级职称吗？青年基金还没结题的情况下还能报面上吗？
已经有18人回复
-
函评这一关首先干掉一大半，今年卷上天了
已经有21人回复
-
领导好安排自己做杂事。在成果上给领导挂名，请其不要经常安排自己做杂事
已经有8人回复
31楼2018-11-06 21:57:54
kakarote
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 108 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.055
- 金币: 4816.7
- 散金: 21690
- 红花: 75
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 11367
- 在线: 425.5小时
- 虫号: 614324
- 注册: 2008-09-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 应用光学
2楼2018-06-18 23:18:36
kingzhoupku
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 21.5
- 散金: 425
- 帖子: 129
- 在线: 100.5小时
- 虫号: 6178806
- 注册: 2017-03-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 动力学与控制
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2018-06-19 08:45:11
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2018-06-19 08:45:11
|
希望灰常大，这个期刊要么直接接受要么直接拒稿，没有返修一说，基本上都会拒稿让修改一哈。好好改希望很大。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2018-06-18 23:22:16
taoguo2013
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1035.8
- 帖子: 218
- 在线: 7.4小时
- 虫号: 2450303
- 注册: 2013-05-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电力系统
4楼2018-06-18 23:23:25
40