24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 472  |  回复: 9
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者1114130692将赠送您 100 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

1114130692

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 这修改意见是什么意思 ?求助广大虫友 已有2人参与

The results section should be expanded by adding more results analysis. This paper investigates and finds out which algorithm is better. However, the authors have to explain WHY. There is a big gap between the results and conclusion. There should be the result analysis between these two sections. I can see that the results are significant, but why? After comparing the algorithms, you have to be able to analyse the results and relate them to the structure of each algorithm. It would be interesting to have your thoughts on why the proposed methods performed better at the end of the results section. Please also discuss the reason that why other algorithms did or did not perform well on the test cases. Such analyses would be the core of our work where you prove your understanding of the reason behind the results. You can also link the findings to the hypotheses of the algorithms investigated in results analysis section. I would expect a very deep analysis from differentperspective in the revised draft.

发自小木虫Android客户端
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
审稿人希望楼主深入分析实验结果,在充分讨论的基础上得出结论。
咱也是有组织的人了...
9楼2018-05-02 23:55:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

cjb654991492

木虫 (著名写手)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2018-05-02 23:47:28
是不是结果分析部分分析的不够充分啊?好像是让你说明为什么你提出的算法更好。

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2018-05-02 16:50:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

XLLD

新虫 (著名写手)

师兄(姐),请问下您投电子学报了么?情况如何?

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2018-05-02 17:10:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lsx1234567

新虫 (正式写手)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2018-05-02 23:47:36
大概意思就是,结果和结论之间的联系,没交代清楚。结果分析,算法好,好在哪里,为什么好,比其他算法有什么优势。我看审稿人特别想知道这个问题,审稿意见里反复提及。

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2018-05-02 18:07:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见