| 查看: 751 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
这样的意见咋会呢？快被玩死了
|
||
二审审稿人给了这个意见The author claim that the elimination of organic pollutant by photocatalytic mineralization "is beyond the research scope in this work". In this case, the question remaining, what is in fact the aim of this work? In fact, the aims are not clearly stated at the end of the Introduction part.，第一次会的时候没回好，这可怎么办啊？ 我写了以下意见，求高手帮我斟酌下:Answer: Thanks for the comments and suggestions. In this work, we studied the synthesized of flower-like WO3 and investigated the evolution of morphology and the growth mechanism of WO3. Subsequently, we direct growth of Ag particles on the WO3 and evaluated the photocatalytic activities by the degradation of MB and 2-CP under natural sunlight. As the reviewer mentioned, the aims are not clearly stated at the end of the Introduction part. Therefore, we had rewritten the end of the introduction. 万分感谢  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
如何掌握一门外语？
已经有0人回复
-
企业为什么一定要做“专精特新”认定？如何成为专精特新企业？
已经有5人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有184人回复
-
求助ASIQwin新版本的软件
已经有0人回复
-
求全国高速分析学术交流会论文集
已经有2人回复
-
期待科研合作，共同发表论文
已经有215人回复
-
如何掌握一门外语？
已经有25人回复
-
国家级人才团体课题组招收2026届博士
已经有1人回复
-
气相色谱点不着火
已经有1人回复
-
求Bi2O3标准卡片PDF41-1449
已经有0人回复
-
化工安全有关的复习提纲
已经有0人回复
