| 查看: 345 | 回复: 2 | |||
[求助]
大家来帮忙看一下审稿人的意见
|
|
Some important details of catalyst evaluations are missing, such as catalyst particle size and stirring rate. Without these details, I am not sure if your experimental data was reliable, since I cannot tell if internal or external diffusion effect exists in your experiments. In the revised manuscript, I would like to see all these experimental details along with criterion for excluding mass and heat transfer effects. In addition, since catalyst amount did affect performance, as reported in the manuscript, it appears that mass transfer effect occurred, which was not desirable and may revise your conclusion. 这是审稿人的意见，是直接用间歇式反应釜做的反应。不是固定床反应也要考虑内外扩散的影响吗？ 这个意见该怎么回复呢？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中国地质大学（武汉）—国家级青年人才杨明教授组-招收博士-新能源材料化学及催化材料
已经有32人回复
-
求光催化产过氧化氢的PPT ！！！毕业答辩需要
已经有1人回复
-
专业论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有65人回复
-
求一个反应的产物
已经有6人回复
-
湖南大学招收锂离子电池、离子液体、高分子与凝胶材料、电催化方向博士生多名
已经有5人回复
-
关于五水硝酸铋还原得到单质铋的问题
已经有1人回复
-
山东省青年基金什么时候拨款
已经有23人回复
2楼2018-03-16 10:16:29
3楼2018-03-16 10:19:32