24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 4859  |  回复: 14
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ifly0

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 电力系统方向,applied science 期刊意见求助已有1人参与

本人电力系统小硕一枚,着急毕业,投了一篇applied science的文章,是开源sci,影响因子一点多,目前回复了两个意见,请问录用有机会么,编辑还没给意见
专家1意见:
English language and style
( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
(x) Moderate English changes required
( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style

        Yes        Can be improved        Must be improved        Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Is the research design appropriate?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the methods adequately described?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Are the results clearly presented?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
I think the section on problem statement should be shortened, as this problem has already been reported in the literature. I suggested to add the following relevant paper to the references as well:
A. Hooshyar, M. A. Azzouz and E. F. El-Saadany, "Three-Phase Fault Direction Identification for Distribution Systems With DFIG-Based Wind DG," IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 747-756, July 2014.

专家2意见:
English language and style
( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
(x) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style

Comments and Suggestions for Authors
I believe the above paper fall in the periphery of the Applied Sciences journal purposes.
The paper is too technical and focused on the power systems and wind turbines area.
Thus, I would propose to suggest the authors to submit their work in a technical journal of the specific area of power systems and wind turbines/RES technical aspects. Article has serious flaws, additional experiments needed, research not conducted correctly
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ifly0

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by nkajuan at 2018-03-07 11:30:16
感觉意见非常不积极呢

感觉第一个还可以,第二感觉莫名其妙,尤其是最后一句评论
8楼2018-03-07 11:32:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答

koath

铜虫 (初入文坛)

你从系统哪里可以看到审稿意见?谢谢
2楼2018-03-06 22:40:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3楼2018-03-06 23:05:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ifly0

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by koath at 2018-03-06 22:40:04
你从系统哪里可以看到审稿意见?谢谢

就在mdpi杂志网站上,登陆自己的账号进入自己的主页,左边Display Submitted Manuscripts选项,我也是刚刚可以看到评论的,但是编辑还没给意见
4楼2018-03-07 11:28:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见