| 查看: 5214 | 回复: 14 | |||
[求助]
电力系统方向，applied science 期刊意见求助 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
本人电力系统小硕一枚，着急毕业，投了一篇applied science的文章，是开源sci，影响因子一点多，目前回复了两个意见，请问录用有机会么，编辑还没给意见 专家1意见： English language and style ( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required (x) Moderate English changes required ( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required ( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) Is the research design appropriate? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) Are the methods adequately described? (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) Are the results clearly presented? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) Are the conclusions supported by the results? (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments and Suggestions for Authors I think the section on problem statement should be shortened, as this problem has already been reported in the literature. I suggested to add the following relevant paper to the references as well: A. Hooshyar, M. A. Azzouz and E. F. El-Saadany, "Three-Phase Fault Direction Identification for Distribution Systems With DFIG-Based Wind DG," IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 747-756, July 2014. 专家2意见： English language and style ( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required ( ) Moderate English changes required (x) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required ( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style Comments and Suggestions for Authors I believe the above paper fall in the periphery of the Applied Sciences journal purposes. The paper is too technical and focused on the power systems and wind turbines area. Thus, I would propose to suggest the authors to submit their work in a technical journal of the specific area of power systems and wind turbines/RES technical aspects. Article has serious flaws, additional experiments needed, research not conducted correctly |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有5人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有8人回复
-
不应该看fileCode
已经有6人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有6人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有21人回复
-
长年满屏的广告，版主太不责任了。基金也等的急
已经有4人回复
-
filecode
已经有15人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有35人回复
-
职称评审，求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊
已经有4人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有10人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
11楼2018-03-07 15:41:47
2楼2018-03-06 22:40:04
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2018-03-06 23:05:35
4楼2018-03-07 11:28:40
nkajuan
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 965.3
- 散金: 70
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 326
- 在线: 70.9小时
- 虫号: 4545071
- 注册: 2016-03-27
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
5楼2018-03-07 11:30:16
6楼2018-03-07 11:31:04
nkajuan
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 965.3
- 散金: 70
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 326
- 在线: 70.9小时
- 虫号: 4545071
- 注册: 2016-03-27
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
7楼2018-03-07 11:31:15
8楼2018-03-07 11:32:40
9楼2018-03-07 11:34:37
10楼2018-03-07 11:58:30
