| 查看: 798 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
请问有人用BET测过涂层孔隙率么 已有1人参与
|
|
本人做的方向为铝合金微弧氧化，目前投稿至《Vacuum》返回了修改意见，编辑建议我加做实验，用BET测膜层孔隙率，但我感觉这个方法好像不能测孔隙率，以下是我跟编辑的回复，大家来讨论下，这个方法到底是否能涂层获得孔隙率？ Commont:It is advised to present the porosity by an independent method like BET, since you use the porosity obtained by electrochemical test results to interpret the corrosion made by the same electrochemical method. Response: Special thanks to you for this good advice that we have honestly considered. We have been looking for ways to improve the quality of this part and we would like to explain some of our research ideas with you. BET: We have given serious consideration to this method you advised. The method has been widely used in powder materials, especially in ultrafine powders and nano-powder materials. There is some debate, however, as to whether the method could truly reflect the porosity of MAO coating systems. The BET measurement requires collected power samples, which can’t be realized in our systems since the loose coating structures has been destroyed during the sample preparation (We try to scrape it off from the substrates or use solution to peel it off) and the intact free-standing coatings samples can’t be preserved. Unlike other power samples, the pores in our MAO coatings is of the micron scale. The coating/substrate system is like a “sponge”, and the pore information would be lost if the intact sponge is torn. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
接收材料类调剂
已经有15人回复
-
上海交通大学材料学院李万万研究员招收2026年“申请-考核制”博士生一名
已经有31人回复
-
有机高分子材料论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有116人回复
-
上海科技大学材料器件中心合作导师科研成果速递
已经有0人回复
-
【调剂申请】材料工程-总分255-本科材料化学专业-一志愿河北工业大学
已经有3人回复
-
293 材料工程求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
祈福中标
已经有41人回复
-
重庆高校接受研究生调剂，材料、化学、计算机方向
已经有0人回复
-
欢迎08开头或部分07开头的有缘人报考
已经有18人回复
-
书籍求助：Gallium Oxide: Materials Properties, Crystal Growth, and Devices
已经有4人回复
-
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
已经有3人回复
zhaoguixuan 
禁虫 (著名写手)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2018-01-04 22:15:01
