24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3634)
>文献求助 (425)
>虫友互识 (315)
>导师招生 (296)
>考博 (165)
>论文投稿 (119)
>基金申请 (110)
>硕博家园 (90)
>招聘信息布告栏 (79)
>博后之家 (78)
>休闲灌水 (75)
>公派出国 (61)
>教师之家 (58)
>找工作 (58)
>考研 (47)
>论文道贺祈福 (31)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tylers

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 29.5
帖子: 11
在线: 9.1小时
虫号: 7314003

[交流] IEEE ACCESS这样的审稿意见重投还有希望吗

各位大佬看下这个审稿意见，重投有希望吗 IEEE ACCESS的稿件
I have been able to get review comments from three independent reviewers. As you will see, all the three reviewers raise the similar concern on the issue of computational complexity comparison. Furthermore, Reviewer 1 questions the novel contributions of the paper, which need to be better demonstrated. In view of the criticisms of the reviewers found at the bottom of this letter and based on my own reading, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access in the current form.
We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your paper once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, we need to reject an article even if it requires minor revisions.
Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript.
主要是第一个审稿人的意见比较尖锐。

回复此楼