| 查看: 16015 | 回复: 29 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
ieee access 论文投稿被拒了·大神帮忙看看是怎么回事！ 已有19人参与
|
|||
|
论文投了一个月，AE给了拒绝，两个审稿人都是拒绝，还提了一些意见，第一次投稿被拒，不明白这是什么意思，重投中的几率大么？ It is found that the problem addressed in this paper has been widely studied in numerous works. The results presented here do not provide significant progress. The utility function is not justified, and does not take into account the effect of the powers (of transmsión and of interference) in the troughput. The signaling model described does not seem realistic. It seems (although the description of the mechanism is somewhat confusing), that in each iteration of the power selection algorithm it is necessary that all nodes send a signalling message. Even if this were acceptable, it would only be valid in the case where all nodes trasmitted continuously, not for bursty traffic. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your paper once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, we need to reject an article even if it requires minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript; however include a list of the updates that you made from the previous manuscript in a separate document. The list of updates should have the following regarding each comment: 1) Reviewer’s concern, 2) your response to the concern, 3) actual changes implemented. For grammatical corrections, we kindly request that you highlight all individual changes in the updated manuscript. As an example, you may submit your revised article with the "editing mode" feature turned on. Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request. We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有49人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有21人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有8人回复
-
各位道友，我要去昆明玩几天，回来见。
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有10人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有11人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有8人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有37人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有7人回复
kill_speed
铁虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 306.8
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 343
- 在线: 29.4小时
- 虫号: 4280372
- 注册: 2015-12-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理
9楼2017-12-05 00:18:46
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2017-12-04 22:57:26
makunjida
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1291 (讲师)
- 金币: 17869.3
- 散金: 481
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 7547
- 在线: 399小时
- 虫号: 1578528
- 注册: 2012-01-15
- 专业: 计算机软件
3楼2017-12-04 22:58:23
4楼2017-12-04 23:29:35
