| 查看: 15572 | 回复: 29 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
ieee access 论文投稿被拒了·大神帮忙看看是怎么回事!已有19人参与
|
|||
|
论文投了一个月,AE给了拒绝,两个审稿人都是拒绝,还提了一些意见,第一次投稿被拒,不明白这是什么意思,重投中的几率大么? It is found that the problem addressed in this paper has been widely studied in numerous works. The results presented here do not provide significant progress. The utility function is not justified, and does not take into account the effect of the powers (of transmsión and of interference) in the troughput. The signaling model described does not seem realistic. It seems (although the description of the mechanism is somewhat confusing), that in each iteration of the power selection algorithm it is necessary that all nodes send a signalling message. Even if this were acceptable, it would only be valid in the case where all nodes trasmitted continuously, not for bursty traffic. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your paper once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, we need to reject an article even if it requires minor revisions. Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript; however include a list of the updates that you made from the previous manuscript in a separate document. The list of updates should have the following regarding each comment: 1) Reviewer’s concern, 2) your response to the concern, 3) actual changes implemented. For grammatical corrections, we kindly request that you highlight all individual changes in the updated manuscript. As an example, you may submit your revised article with the "editing mode" feature turned on. Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request. We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions. |
» 猜你喜欢
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有15人回复
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
读博
已经有3人回复
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊,第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有9人回复
到新单位后,换了新的研究方向,没有团队,持续积累2区以上论文,能申请到面上吗
已经有8人回复
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
zrh1981819
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1052.8
- 散金: 196
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 644
- 在线: 116.4小时
- 虫号: 1344710
- 注册: 2011-07-13
- 专业: 交通工程
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-12-05 11:11:35
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-12-05 11:11:35
|
2个外审都认为没有创新性,除非大改重投,否则机会不大。外审认为你的工作别人做过了。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
12楼2017-12-05 07:20:46
zrh1981819
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1052.8
- 散金: 196
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 644
- 在线: 116.4小时
- 虫号: 1344710
- 注册: 2011-07-13
- 专业: 交通工程
13楼2017-12-05 07:22:47













回复此楼