24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2225)
>虫友互识 (274)
>导师招生 (57)
>论文道贺祈福 (48)
>基金申请 (37)
>硕博家园 (31)
>仿真模拟 (23)
>文献求助 (21)
>休闲灌水 (19)
>博后之家 (18)
>考研 (18)
>论文投稿 (16)
>教师之家 (14)
>考博 (14)
>找工作 (14)
>公派出国 (14)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ay_guobo

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 12 (小学生)
金币: 1138
散金: 50
红花: 20
帖子: 304
在线: 131.5小时
虫号: 769940
注册: 2009-05-14
性别: GG
专业: 计算机科学的基础理论

[交流] 投稿 ACM Transactions ，返回了编辑意见，大家帮忙给看看希望大不已有1人参与

主编主要说：返回你的审稿意见了，你如果提交返修稿件，应该怎么操作 bla bla 一堆

反而是副主编给了如下的信息：
The reviewing process of your paper is now complete. The reviewers have raised many questions about your techniques and their novelty. Several closely related papers are not surveyed or compared. Due to these reasons, I am unable to recommend acceptance of your paper. However, it
seems to me that your work is somewhat different from existing works. I thus decide to recommend revise & resubmit. You can decide whether it is possible for you to improve your work and resubmit to satisfy this set of reviewers.

三个审稿人，2个让修改，一个拒绝

三个审稿人给修改论文的程度的评价为：
1、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Light

2、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate

3、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate

回复此楼