| 查看: 834 | 回复: 2 | |||
[交流]
投稿 ACM Transactions ,返回了编辑意见,大家帮忙给看看希望大不 已有1人参与
|
主编主要说:返回你的审稿意见了,你如果提交返修稿件,应该怎么操作 bla bla 一堆![]() 反而是副主编给了如下的信息: The reviewing process of your paper is now complete. The reviewers have raised many questions about your techniques and their novelty. Several closely related papers are not surveyed or compared. Due to these reasons, I am unable to recommend acceptance of your paper. However, it seems to me that your work is somewhat different from existing works. I thus decide to recommend revise & resubmit. You can decide whether it is possible for you to improve your work and resubmit to satisfy this set of reviewers. 三个审稿人,2个让修改,一个拒绝 三个审稿人给修改论文的程度的评价为: 1、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Light 2、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate 3、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate |
» 猜你喜欢
今年的WR进展到哪一步了?
已经有8人回复
时间戳他又来了
已经有17人回复
系统今天又提示维护了,估计离放榜不远了
已经有9人回复
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有4人回复
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么?
已经有7人回复
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有19人回复
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有14人回复
微信指数没变化,科研之友没阅读
已经有8人回复
这种情况还有戏吗
已经有11人回复
同事接到电话了,我却没有
已经有4人回复


2楼2017-11-30 14:35:10
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2017-11-30 23:22:33











主编主要说:返回你的审稿意见了,你如果提交返修稿件,应该怎么操作 bla bla 一堆
回复此楼