| 查看: 763 | 回复: 2 | |||
[交流]
投稿 ACM Transactions ，返回了编辑意见，大家帮忙给看看希望大不 已有1人参与
|
 主编主要说：返回你的审稿意见了，你如果提交返修稿件，应该怎么操作 bla bla 一堆反而是副主编给了如下的信息： The reviewing process of your paper is now complete. The reviewers have raised many questions about your techniques and their novelty. Several closely related papers are not surveyed or compared. Due to these reasons, I am unable to recommend acceptance of your paper. However, it seems to me that your work is somewhat different from existing works. I thus decide to recommend revise & resubmit. You can decide whether it is possible for you to improve your work and resubmit to satisfy this set of reviewers. 三个审稿人，2个让修改，一个拒绝 三个审稿人给修改论文的程度的评价为： 1、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Light 2、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate 3、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
211本科材料化工求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
332求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
305求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
085410 273求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂，985材料与化工348分
已经有3人回复
-
262求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
山东省基金2026
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿厦大0856，306求调剂
已经有4人回复
2楼2017-11-30 14:35:10
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2017-11-30 23:22:33
