| 查看: 741 | 回复: 2 | |||
[交流]
投稿 ACM Transactions ，返回了编辑意见，大家帮忙给看看希望大不 已有1人参与
|
 主编主要说：返回你的审稿意见了，你如果提交返修稿件，应该怎么操作 bla bla 一堆反而是副主编给了如下的信息： The reviewing process of your paper is now complete. The reviewers have raised many questions about your techniques and their novelty. Several closely related papers are not surveyed or compared. Due to these reasons, I am unable to recommend acceptance of your paper. However, it seems to me that your work is somewhat different from existing works. I thus decide to recommend revise & resubmit. You can decide whether it is possible for you to improve your work and resubmit to satisfy this set of reviewers. 三个审稿人，2个让修改，一个拒绝 三个审稿人给修改论文的程度的评价为： 1、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Light 2、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate 3、Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有8人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有28人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有11人回复
-
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
-
请教限项目规定
已经有4人回复
-
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗？
已经有20人回复
-
26申博
已经有3人回复
-
基金委咋了？2026年的指南还没有出来？
已经有10人回复
-
基金申报
已经有6人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
2楼2017-11-30 14:35:10
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2017-11-30 23:22:33