| ²é¿´: 858 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
ay_guobo½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Ͷ¸å ACM Transactions £¬·µ»ØÁ˱à¼Òâ¼û£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ¸ø¿´¿´Ï£Íû´ó²» ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
Ö÷±àÖ÷Ҫ˵£º·µ»ØÄãµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÁË£¬ÄãÈç¹ûÌá½»·µÐÞ¸å¼þ£¬Ó¦¸ÃÔõô²Ù×÷ bla bla Ò»¶Ñ![]() ·´¶øÊǸ±Ö÷±à¸øÁËÈçϵÄÐÅÏ¢£º The reviewing process of your paper is now complete. The reviewers have raised many questions about your techniques and their novelty. Several closely related papers are not surveyed or compared. Due to these reasons, I am unable to recommend acceptance of your paper. However, it seems to me that your work is somewhat different from existing works. I thus decide to recommend revise & resubmit. You can decide whether it is possible for you to improve your work and resubmit to satisfy this set of reviewers. Èý¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬2¸öÈÃÐ޸ģ¬Ò»¸ö¾Ü¾ø Èý¸öÉó¸åÈ˸øÐÞ¸ÄÂÛÎÄµÄ³Ì¶ÈµÄÆÀ¼ÛΪ£º 1¡¢Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Light 2¡¢Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate 3¡¢Please help ACM create a more efficient time-to-publication process: Using your best judgment, what amount of copy editing do you think this paper needs?: Moderate |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ϊʲô×ÊÖúÊý¸÷´ó¸ßУ¶¼´´Ð¸ߣ¬×Ô¼ºÉêÇëÔõô¾ÍÕâôÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
»ù½ðδÖУ¬ÕâÖÖ´ð¸´ÊÇÄ£°åÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¿´°åÉÏÕâô¶àÖеģ¬ÓеãÏñ50ÈËȺÀï49¸öÈ˶¼ÊÇÆ×ÓµÄÄÇÖָоõ¡¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çà»ùÈçºÎÆÆ¾Ö
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»ù½ð²»ÖУ¬¹²Ãã
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ôõô¿´Çà»ùÖÐÁËûÓа¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÃÎÏë
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´

ay_guobo
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1138
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 20
- Ìû×Ó: 304
- ÔÚÏß: 131.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 769940
- ×¢²á: 2009-05-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»ú¿ÆÑ§µÄ»ù´¡ÀíÂÛ

2Â¥2017-11-30 14:35:10
|
×£¸£ ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |
3Â¥2017-11-30 23:22:33









Ö÷±àÖ÷Ҫ˵£º·µ»ØÄãµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÁË£¬ÄãÈç¹ûÌá½»·µÐÞ¸å¼þ£¬Ó¦¸ÃÔõô²Ù×÷ bla bla Ò»¶Ñ
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
10