24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2366  |  回复: 11

hh_3629110

银虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 期刊拒绝修改后重投 已有1人参与

投稿近两周后收到拒稿信,原因是文章创新不足(第一次被拒也是同样理由),同时拒绝修改后重投,这种情况表示什么呢?因为投稿文章水平实在太差么?求指导~~~拒稿信内容截取如下:
Your study yielded important results that are highly relevant for the management of groundwater resources in the area, but the manuscript does not contain sufficient novel elements to warrant publication in **. No new methods were applied, and nor were there outcomes that have a broader implications for our international audience. Without these elements, I can unfortunately not consider your manuscript for further review. I believe, however, that the work is of real value, so I respectfully suggest that you submit it to a more-appropriate journal.
According to ** policy, this decision means that you may not resubmit this manuscript to HJ in any form, even after making revisions, and you should not submit this or a revised version to HJ at a later time as a new manuscript.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fengjx123

新虫 (小有名气)

你投的什么期刊啊,顶刊吧?

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2017-11-23 14:54:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hh_3629110

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by fengjx123 at 2017-11-23 14:54:55
你投的什么期刊啊,顶刊吧?

不是顶刊,影响因子也不高,两次被拒都是说创新不够,而且这次直接拒绝重投,感觉挺严重,比较郁闷,所以在想是不是文章其他的原因。
3楼2017-11-23 15:16:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

南博屹

新虫 (小有名气)



sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-11-23 16:47:42
如果连续拒稿,那应该修改文章

发自小木虫IOS客户端
4楼2017-11-23 15:18:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

江南人

新虫 (初入文坛)


sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-11-23 16:47:51
文章写的不够好

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2017-11-23 15:20:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hh_3629110

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 南博屹 at 2017-11-23 15:18:43
如果连续拒稿,那应该修改文章

嗯,第一次被拒后花了两个月修改再投,看来还是没得要领。
6楼2017-11-23 15:42:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

南博屹

新虫 (小有名气)



sesame_oil: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-11-23 16:47:59
这次投稿没

发自小木虫IOS客户端
7楼2017-11-23 15:43:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hh_3629110

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by 南博屹 at 2017-11-23 15:43:46
这次投稿没

第一次投稿很快被拒,修改两月后第二次投稿,拒稿信就是最上面那个结果。
8楼2017-11-23 16:15:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
hh_3629110(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-11-24 09:11:52
Your study yielded important results that are highly relevant for the management of groundwater resources in the area, but the manuscript does not contain sufficient novel elements to warrant publication in **. No new methods were applied, and nor were there outcomes that have a broader implications for our international audience. Without these elements, I can unfortunately not consider your manuscript for further review. I believe, however, that the work is of real value, so I respectfully suggest that you submit it to a more-appropriate journal.
According to ** policy, this decision means that you may not resubmit this manuscript to HJ in any form, even after making revisions, and you should not submit this or a revised version to HJ at a later time as a new manuscript.


拒稿了,即使你修改后也不能投稿了,作为新的稿件投稿到这个杂志也不行,说明你第一拒稿后没有好好修改,给你提出的意见没有好好看看
不是哥不笑,一笑粉就掉
9楼2017-11-23 16:50:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hh_3629110

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by sesame_oil at 2017-11-23 16:50:46
Your study yielded important results that are highly relevant for the management of groundwater resources in the area, but the manuscript does not contain sufficient novel elements to warrant publica ...

嗯嗯,谢谢。两次投稿不是在同一期刊,两次都是以创新不够被拒,没有给出具体的修改意见。只能再努力修改了!
10楼2017-11-23 17:24:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 hh_3629110 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见