| 查看: 6931 | 回复: 26 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者bb736532将赠送您 3 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
各位大虾，刚收到专家意见Consider after Major Changes 但是 编辑直接Rejected 已有7人参与
|
||
|
在 Shock and Vibration上投了论文 专家给的是Consider after Major Changes 但是 编辑直接Rejected 专辑意见： This paper studies the influence of******. However, it is not insightful enough to be published. The comments are listed as follows: 1）Based on a preliminary reading, the English text is to be significantly improved and substantial editing is required before it is accepted for publication. My advice is that you have your manuscript edited by a native English speaker. Alternatively, you may use an editing service. 2）Too many Chinese language articles are cited which is not suitable for publication in an international journal. 3）With regard to the equations listed in the paper, Eqns. (1)-(3) should not be repeated with the related references, only the final results and citations are required to be written. The same case for the other equations, the authors should give the proper citation and outstand contribution. 4）The authors cite many articles in section 2 and section 3. Which theory or equation is proposed by you? What is the function and application of them in this paper? 5）Section 4, the constitutive law of rock used in the numerical simulation should be given. How is the model setup related to analytical solution? 6）Section 5, the application is totally isolated from the previous analytical solution and numerical simulation. In this regard, we cannot find the usefulness of this study to support the engineering design. 请问有没有必要修改后重新投稿还是改投好 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
20楼2017-11-13 00:41:19
 本帖仅楼主可见 |
2楼2017-11-12 14:52:46
3楼2017-11-12 14:54:05
4楼2017-11-12 14:56:56
20