| 查看: 3544 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
这种情况是否要申诉一下 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
请教各位虫友，这种情况是否要申诉一下。 二审回来的意见都不错，但是编辑说意见不好给拒了，还是我理解错了。望大家不吝赐教！ 谢谢！ Dear Mrs. X, Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production. After careful review, I regret to inform you that reviewers don't support to publish your above noted manuscript for publication in "Journal of Cleaner Production". I have appended the comments of the reviewers in order for you to understand the basis for the final decision. However, I do think it could be considered by another journal, and I would like to suggest that you take advantage of the article transfer service that "Journal of Cleaner Production" is part of. This gives you the option to have your manuscript files and details transferred to another journal. This removes the need for you to resubmit and reformat your manuscript, saving you valuable time and effort during the submission process. If you click the link below you will find a list of journal that may relevant to your research. You have the option to accept or decline the transfer offer from the same web page: https://ees.elsevier.com/jclepro ... &l=D9QLMOHJ Should you accept this transfer, you will have the opportunity to revise your paper, taking into account the reviews received from "Journal of Cleaner Production". This option does not constitute a guarantee that your paper will be published in the suggested Journal, but it is our hope that this arrangement will help expedite the process for promising papers. To learn more about the new article transfer service, please visit www.elsevier.com/authors/article-transfer-service Yours sincerely, Bin Chen, Ph.D. Associate Editor Journal of Cleaner Production Follow us on Mendeley group "Journal of Cleaner Production". https://www.mendeley.com/communi ... es_email_jclp-group Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: After a second reading of the revised paper, and the answers for the comments provided by the reviewers, I agree with the final publication. This is due the fact that the authors have provided all necessary clarification to the questions and comments. Reviewer #2: According to revisions provided by authors, the Manuscript is now acceptable to be published by Journal. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
人气不行了
已经有11人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有22人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有3人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有7人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有18人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有27人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 热点：IMF与美国唱反调：十年来首评人民币“估值合理”
已经有0人回复
- 李嘉玉：留学美国你为什么不能作弊
已经有3人回复
- B1签证是否还有效
已经有5人回复
- 高考作文该如何考查学生的批判性思维
已经有2人回复
- 我们不能做这样的男人
已经有3人回复
- 【讨论】用工荒：倒逼的产业升级步伐
已经有0人回复
- 看物理学家怎样搞定交通罚单
已经有6人回复
- 好东西，请大家收藏.写给****大学职称聘委会的申诉书
已经有20人回复
- 几乎要崩溃了！大家帮我看看是否有挽回的余地？谢谢了
已经有112人回复
tibetnamco
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 72 (初中生)
- 金币: 2090
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 801
- 在线: 112.5小时
- 虫号: 796561
- 注册: 2009-06-18
- 专业: 污染物行为过程及其环境效
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
msh1216: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2017-10-25 10:48:06
msh1216: 金币+10, ★有帮助, 金币都给你吧，关帖，重新奋斗 2017-10-25 10:53:22
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
msh1216: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2017-10-25 10:48:06
msh1216: 金币+10, ★有帮助, 金币都给你吧，关帖，重新奋斗 2017-10-25 10:53:22
| Bin Chen这么处理是有些令人费解，下次当面问问他，呵呵。没有给出（足够）有说服力的退稿理由，就是让改投另外一个刊，真是醉了。如果审稿意见就是你帖出来的这么positive 的话。但是换句话来说，他既然这么说了，你申诉也没有多少用，这就是江湖，编辑说了算。估计这刊比较牛，不差稿吧 |
4楼2017-10-25 10:47:08
2楼2017-10-25 10:30:15
3楼2017-10-25 10:46:32
hmhminy
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2770.8
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 353
- 在线: 83.7小时
- 虫号: 1151822
- 注册: 2010-11-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 社会心理学
5楼2017-10-25 10:47:47
20