±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 461  |  »Ø¸´: 4
µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ­´æµµ¡£

4220824

ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

ÔçÆðµÄ³æ¶ù±»Äñ³Ô

[½»Á÷] ¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿±à¼­µÃ»ØÐŵÄÒ»¸öÎÊÌâ

ÕâÊDZ༭µÄ»ØÐÅ
Dear Professor Wang
I am reviewing your submission £¬just now.
It seems that additional data have been collected to include a substantial proportion of the possible Friedel pairs. That allowed you to refine the structure to a reasonable data/parameter ratio of 1820/146  = "12.5" and also to use refinement of the Flack parameter "0.04(12)" to provide a credible determination of the absolute structure.
Would you please tell me "the number of Friedel pairs measured" to determine the absolute structure ?

With my best wishes,

ÒòΪÎÒ²»Êǵ¥¾§×¨ÒµµÄ£¬ÓÐЩÊõÓï¿´²»¶®£¬ÏëÎÊÎÊ£¬Ëû×îºóÒ»¸öÎÊ£¬ÊÇÏëÈÃÎÒ×öÊ²Ã´ÄØ£¿
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ÒÑÔÄ   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

James357

ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
4220824(½ð±Ò+5,VIP+0):лл°ïæ 2-20 18:25
ÄãÓÃÓÚ¼ÆËã½á¹¹Ê±ºòµÄ Friedel pairsÖµÊǶàÉÙ¡£
ÄãÓÃFriedel pairsÖµ¼ÆËãÁ˽á¹û²¢ÓÃÆäËü²ÎÊýÅÐ¶ÏÆäºÏÀíÐÔ£¬¿ÉÊÇÄãûÓÐÌṩFriedel pairsÊǶàÉÙ¡£

[ Last edited by James357 on 2009-2-20 at 14:36 ]
2Â¥2009-02-20 14:32:07
ÒÑÔÄ   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

xi2004

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)

Õâ¸öCCDC×Ô¼ºÓиöºÜ¾ßÌåµÄ˵Ã÷,ÈçºÎÀ´Ëã Friedel pairs ,
ÎҼǵÃÎÒÔÚij¸öÌù×ÓÀïÌù¹ýµÄ.
xi2004-emuch@163.com
3Â¥2009-02-20 15:04:49
ÒÑÔÄ   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

xi2004

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)

¡ï
lingzi326(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):ллÈÈÐĻظ´ 2-20 20:40
http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checking/STRVA_01.html

PROC-NAME: STRVAL_01 (FL)

PURPOSE: To check that _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack is within expected limits.

PROCEDURE:
FLACK = _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack
SFLACK = su of _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack

TEST
IF FLACK > 0.7 issue ALERT C
   "Alert C Chirality of atom sites is inverted?"
The correct absolute structure has been defined by the atomic coordinates if _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack is close to 0.0 (and the s.u. is sufficiently small). If _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack is close to 1.0, the incorrect enantiomer is being modelled and the atomic coordinates should be inverted and refined again.
In cases of intermediate values of _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack, and you believe that a merohedral twin or a partial mix of enantiomers is present, choose the configuration that gives the lowest value for _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack.

Note that if the s.u. of the Flack parameter is large, e.g. greater than or equal to 0.3, one cannot confidently derive the absolute structure from the data, because, within the 3sigma confidence limits, the full range of possible values of the Flack parameter are plausible. In such cases, even if the Flack parameter itself is close to 0.0, no conclusions about the absolute structure are justified. This will usually be the case if the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer (i.e. no atom heavier than Si is present). If a heavy atom is present, but the s.u. is still large, you should ensure that a significant fraction (ideally all) of the Friedel opposites of the symmetry unique reflections have been included in the data set.

If the absolute structure parameter is meaningless because the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer, it is best to remove the absolute structure parameter from the CIF.

If the absolute structure parameter is meaningful, please also provide appropriate reference details under _refine_ls_abs_structure_details. For example:

  _refine_ls_abs_structure_details 'Flack (1983), XXXX Friedel pairs'

and replace the XXXX with the actual number of Friedel pairs used in the refinement. [An easy way to determine the number of Friedel pairs is to look at the difference between the number of unique reflections used in SHELXL when a MERG2 and MERG 3 instruction is used (MERG 3 forces Friedel pairs to be merged before use).]

ELSE IF FLACK > 0.3 AND FLACK < 0.7 issue ALERT C
   "Alert C Flack test results are ambiguous."
The correct absolute structure has been defined by the atomic coordinates if _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack is close to 0.0 (and the s.u. is sufficiently small).
In cases of intermediate values of _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack, a merohedral twin or a partial mix of enantiomers may be present and this fact should be discussed in the manuscript. However, intermediate values might also be obtained when the absolute structure parameter is essentially meaningless because the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer.

Note that if the s.u. of the Flack parameter is large, e.g. > 0.3, one cannot confidently derive the absolute structure from the data, because, within the 3sigma confidence limits, the full range of possible values of the Flack parameter are plausible. In such cases, even if the Flack parameter itself is close to 0.0, no conclusions about the absolute structure are justified. This will usually be the case if the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer (i.e. no atom heavier than Si is present). If a heavy atom is present, but the s.u. is still large, you should ensure that a significant fraction (ideally all) of the Friedel opposites of the symmetry unique reflections have been included in the data set.

If the absolute structure parameter is meaningless because the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer, it is best to remove the absolute structure parameter from the CIF.

If the absolute structure parameter is meaningful, please also provide appropriate reference details under _refine_ls_abs_structure_details. For example:

  _refine_ls_abs_structure_details 'Flack (1983), XXXX Friedel pairs'

and replace the XXXX with the actual number of Friedel pairs used in the refinement. [An easy way to determine the number of Friedel pairs is to look at the difference between the number of unique reflections used in SHELXL when a MERG2 and MERG 3 instruction is used (MERG 3 forces Friedel pairs to be merged before use).]

ELSE IF FLACK < -0.2 issue ALERT C
   "Alert C Flack parameter is too small."
The value of _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack is well outside the expected range of 0.0-1.0. This may mean that there is some systematic error in the model or data, or that the absolute structure parameter is meaningless because the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer. In the latter case, the s.u. of the Flack parameter is also usually large and it is best to remove the absolute structure parameter from the CIF. If a heavy atom is present in the compound, you should ensure that a significant fraction (ideally all) of the Friedel opposites of the symmetry unique reflections have been included in the data set. If _refine_ls_abs_structure_flack is still out of range, the quality of the data and/or the correctness of the model could be checked carefully.  
ELSE IF SFLACK > 0.5 issue ALERT C
   "Alert C Flack test results are meaningless."
If the s.u. of the Flack parameter is large, e.g. > 0.3, one cannot confidently derive the absolute structure from the data, because, within the 3sigma confidence limits, the full range of possible values of the Flack parameter are plausible. In such cases, even if the Flack parameter itself is close to 0.0, no conclusions about the absolute structure are justified. This will usually be the case if the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer (i.e. no atom heavier than Si is present). If a heavy atom is present, but the s.u. is still large, you should ensure that a significant fraction (ideally all) of the Friedel opposites of the symmetry unique reflections have been included in the data set.
If the absolute structure parameter is meaningless because the compound is a weak anomalous scatterer, it is best to remove the absolute structure parameter from the CIF.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full list of validation algorithms
xi2004-emuch@163.com
4Â¥2009-02-20 15:19:10
ÒÑÔÄ   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

xi2004

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
4220824(½ð±Ò+5,VIP+0):ºÇºÇ£¬¸øµÄÐÅÏ¢ºÜÈ«£¬Ð»Ð»ÁË 2-20 18:26
[An easy way to determine the number of Friedel pairs is to look at the difference between the number of unique reflections used in SHELXL when a MERG2 and MERG 3 instruction is used (MERG 3 forces Friedel pairs to be merged before use).]

¾ÍÊÇÕâ¾ä»°.
xi2004-emuch@163.com
5Â¥2009-02-20 15:19:43
ÒÑÔÄ   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ 4220824 µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Äϲý´óѧ324Çóµ÷¼Á +9 hanamiko 2026-03-30 9/450 2026-04-04 11:04 by Öí»á·É
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á +9 Ò»ÑùYWY 2026-04-03 9/450 2026-04-04 10:55 by hmn_wj
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á +26 kikiki7 2026-03-30 27/1350 2026-04-04 09:18 by qlm5820
[¿¼ÑÐ] 265Çóµ÷¼Á +17 ÁÖÉîÎÂÀ½ 2026-04-01 20/1000 2026-04-04 01:09 by userper
[¿¼ÑÐ] 321Çóµ÷¼Á +10 ÈÏÕæÇóÉÏѧ 2026-04-02 10/500 2026-04-03 16:17 by lijunpoly
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ÖÖÊ¥´Í 2026-03-28 5/250 2026-04-03 12:26 by xingguangj
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298·Ö 070300Çóµ÷¼Á +11 zwen03 2026-04-02 11/550 2026-04-03 10:19 by macy2011
[¿¼ÑÐ] 325·Ö»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á +5 15771691647 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-03 09:58 by ChemPharm
[¿¼ÑÐ] 338Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄÜÔ´¶¯Á¦£¬ÍâÓïÊÇÈÕÓï203 +5 zzz£¬£¬r 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-03 09:45 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼²©] É격ÇóÖú +3 Reee1Llll 2026-04-01 3/150 2026-04-02 22:29 by ÕâÊÇÒ»¸öÎÞÁĵÄê
[¿¼ÑÐ] »·¾³¹¤³Ì297·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸º¼¸ßÔº +15 GENJIOW 2026-03-31 16/800 2026-04-02 17:56 by cyh¡ª315
[¿¼ÑÐ] ѧ˶»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öйúº£Ñó´óѧ320+Çóµ÷¼Á +8 ÅûÐÇºÓ 2026-04-02 8/400 2026-04-02 14:12 by oooqiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] 290Çóµ÷¼Á085701 +3 1314Åõ»¨ 2026-04-02 3/150 2026-04-02 13:34 by Ecowxq666£¡
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©Àí¹¤´óѧ±¾¿Æ211²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì294Çóµ÷¼Á +8 mikasaµÄΧ½í 2026-03-28 9/450 2026-04-02 12:09 by ms629
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±½»´ó²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì×Ü·Ö358 +3 cs0106 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-02 11:37 by olim
[¿¼ÑÐ] 261ÇóBÇøµ÷¼Á +5 Ã÷×С¤ 2026-04-01 7/350 2026-04-02 11:17 by ×Þξξ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 11408 321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +3 huchun12138 2026-03-30 4/200 2026-04-01 22:48 by guanxin1001
[¿¼ÑÐ] 375Çóµ÷¼Á +7 ÓêÏÄÕûÒ¹ 2026-03-29 7/350 2026-03-31 18:52 by xhai2011
[¿¼ÑÐ] 080500-315·Ö¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Á +9 Éϰ¶3821 2026-03-31 9/450 2026-03-31 17:29 by ÌÆãå¶ù
[¿¼ÑÐ] 291Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Y-cap 2026-03-29 6/300 2026-03-29 13:18 by mumin1990
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û