24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者duyang1217将赠送您 9 个金币

duyang1217

铁虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 723.3
红花: 1
帖子: 153
在线: 89.1小时
虫号: 407603
注册: 2007-06-20
性别: GG
专业: 草地科学

[求助] decision in process 纠结中已有6人参与

大修后，两天with editor， under review 一周，目前decision in process 已经4天，大家感觉那种结果的可能性大，谢谢！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

文章投稿一周后状态由with editor 变成decision in process 已经有34人回复
Required Reviews Completed几小时后变成Under Reviwer，纠结啊！（更新3）已经有82人回复
外审后decision in process已经一个月，咋办？已经有15人回复
论文修改返回三个月一直没消息，纠结中。。。已经有2人回复

用心耐心细心的做科研

1楼 2017-10-23 09:38:26

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

duyang1217

铁虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 723.3
红花: 1
帖子: 153
在线: 89.1小时
虫号: 407603
注册: 2007-06-20
性别: GG
专业: 草地科学

决定出来了，又是大修！修改意见如下，大家给些意见，谢谢！
From the handing Editor. If the authors are not able to present the work in a clear and undrestable language, with errors in the terminology, how can the science behind bu trusted? This is even worst considering the previous review. I have decided to give you one more oportunity to present a proper manuscript. We are not talking about doing new experiments but just to correct the previous versión.

Reviewer #1: The revised form of the manuscripts is substantially improved; however, there are still some major flows left. Another thorough revision is necessary.
The abstract is even more confusing than in the previous variant. "Differential abundance protein-coding genes (DAPS)" is a nonsense, the abbreviation DAPS is for differentially abundant protein species (gene products), not genes. This mistake is throughout the entire manuscript. Transcript changes is another level of regulation, do not confuse protein species, transcripts and genes. Again there are common unnecessary words and lack of substantial details. The abstract should be rewritten, the key biological processes and and the most prominent changing protein species should be clearly explained. In the present form the Abstract is unacceptable for me.

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

用心耐心细心的做科研

8楼2017-10-26 16:53:36

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

duyang1217

铁虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 723.3
红花: 1
帖子: 153
在线: 89.1小时
虫号: 407603
注册: 2007-06-20
性别: GG
专业: 草地科学

第二次大修18号返回，19号Under Review一直到现在11天了，状态没变化，第一次大修Under Review一周就Decision in process了。这次怎么回事？审稿意见中“文中太多不必要的叙述，而缺乏实际细节的描述。”这个没重视。看来是修改的不好啊，感觉是要拒的节奏啊。悲哀呀，这篇文章已经折腾了一年半了。

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

用心耐心细心的做科研

12楼2017-11-30 16:08:57

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖