| 查看: 495 | 回复: 1 | |||
withoutsun铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
求助医学文献关于统计分析的一句话翻译！
|
|
Based on this recruitment, we assumed that participation in CRC screening would be at least 12% higher in the patient-specific reminders group than in the other groups (absolute mean difference, 67% vs 55%; estimated SD, 0.61; bilateral α risk, 5%; statistical power, 80%). Participation in the usual care group was estimated at 55% using the following data。 CRC是结肠癌，这是一个随机对照实验研究 跪谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问社科规划办官网上的“项目查询模块”与“项目申报模块”的账号密码一样吗？
已经有3人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有9人回复
-
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有5人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
dangdang3033
金虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 4
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1441.8
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 481
- 在线: 32.7小时
- 虫号: 601440
- 注册: 2008-09-13
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 肿瘤综合治疗
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
withoutsun: 金币+10, ★有帮助 2017-09-28 15:20:01
withoutsun: 金币+10, ★有帮助 2017-09-28 15:20:01
|
Based on this recruitment, we assumed that participation in CRC screening would be at least 12% higher in the patient-specific reminders group than in the other groups (absolute mean difference, 67% vs 55%; estimated SD, 0.61; bilateral α risk, 5%; statistical power, 80%). Participation in the usual care group was estimated at 55% using the following data。 基于此种招募方式，我们假设特定患者提醒组里面参与结肠癌筛查的概率比其他组至少要高出12%。 基于以下数据，普通护理组的参与率估计大概是55%。 |
2楼2017-09-28 11:14:49