| 查看: 2929 | 回复: 15 | |||
linsoklove金虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
各位帮我分析理解一下审稿意见，让我知道该怎么回答 已有4人参与
|
|
今天终于收到了审稿意见，但是由于英文不太好，也由于太过于紧张了吧，现在一脸茫然。还希望各位帮我分析一下该如何回答。审稿意见如下： Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 - Strengths: The problem shown in the manuscript is interesting and well defined. The solving method may be interesting for other researchers. The application of results may lead to increase heat transfer capabilities which is within the scope of the Journal. The CFD simulation is compared with some experimental results. Most of the model parameters are explained. Weaknesses: The main interest for readers would be the simulation method which is described, but some more details could be given such as mesh details (the picture is informative, but number of cells, cell and shape in all regions could be given explicitly). The comparison with the experiment is shown only for offset angle, is it possible to address also at least qualitatively the thickness of the layer? Maybe for one case only but some remarks could be important for other researchers. The minimal flow for sur wetting could be simulated using this method? There is a small mistyped number in Fig 3b experiment shall be 200 instead of 100. -Reviewer 2 - Dear Author, This is well-written article that does identify an important gap in xxxx. There has been a few researches on xxxx reported in open literature. However, the article would be significantly improved with the addition of more review of the xxxx. This is because the review of the literature is not thorough for study of xxxx; because the author only referred to two articles which were published in 2014 and 2007, which has a big gap almost 10 years. The author did not critically review xxxx in the Introduction. This helps to show that this parameter is important to characterize xxxx. The details of my comments and suggestions are attached with this reviewer comments. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有16人回复
-
初秋的晨风
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有11人回复
-
Ei源刊怎么投
已经有4人回复
-
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有6人回复
-
两块石头
已经有5人回复
-
哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生
已经有3人回复
-
找导师
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 【转】裸奔的Barabasi
已经有10人回复
slc0716
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1439.2
- 散金: 432
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 1092
- 在线: 135.6小时
- 虫号: 1689118
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 专业: 活体与复杂样品分析
2楼2017-09-01 17:38:02
linsoklove
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2259.7
- 散金: 7930
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 2022
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 3386277
- 注册: 2014-08-28
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
3楼2017-09-01 18:13:46
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿
4楼2017-09-01 18:22:34
5楼2017-09-01 22:01:02
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-09-01 23:18:14
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
7楼2017-09-01 23:18:35
caomaoguan
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 2086.1
- 散金: 743
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 675
- 在线: 433.7小时
- 虫号: 4431683
- 注册: 2016-02-24
- 专业: 电力系统
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
linsoklove: 金币+80, ★★★很有帮助 2017-09-02 09:46:32
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
linsoklove: 金币+80, ★★★很有帮助 2017-09-02 09:46:32
| 看意见，只要是能把审稿人1给说服了，问题就不大，多和导师商量一下怎么从专业的角度回应审稿人1。审稿人2给的意见很宏观，个人感觉可能是你行文的问题，没有在introduction里把自己的创新点突出出来，还有就是引用的文献不够，2的意见相对好改。全文改好后，建议最后完善下abstract，一阵见血地点出innovation，让人能一下子抓到你的创新点。只要你努力去改了，审稿人和编辑会看到你的诚意的，加油祝福！ |
8楼2017-09-02 09:29:56
linsoklove
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2259.7
- 散金: 7930
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 2022
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 3386277
- 注册: 2014-08-28
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
9楼2017-09-02 09:46:38
linsoklove
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2259.7
- 散金: 7930
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 2022
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 3386277
- 注册: 2014-08-28
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
10楼2017-09-02 09:54:17