| 查看: 2496 | 回复: 15 | |||
linsoklove金虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
各位帮我分析理解一下审稿意见，让我知道该怎么回答 已有4人参与
|
|
今天终于收到了审稿意见，但是由于英文不太好，也由于太过于紧张了吧，现在一脸茫然。还希望各位帮我分析一下该如何回答。审稿意见如下： Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 - Strengths: The problem shown in the manuscript is interesting and well defined. The solving method may be interesting for other researchers. The application of results may lead to increase heat transfer capabilities which is within the scope of the Journal. The CFD simulation is compared with some experimental results. Most of the model parameters are explained. Weaknesses: The main interest for readers would be the simulation method which is described, but some more details could be given such as mesh details (the picture is informative, but number of cells, cell and shape in all regions could be given explicitly). The comparison with the experiment is shown only for offset angle, is it possible to address also at least qualitatively the thickness of the layer? Maybe for one case only but some remarks could be important for other researchers. The minimal flow for sur wetting could be simulated using this method? There is a small mistyped number in Fig 3b experiment shall be 200 instead of 100. -Reviewer 2 - Dear Author, This is well-written article that does identify an important gap in xxxx. There has been a few researches on xxxx reported in open literature. However, the article would be significantly improved with the addition of more review of the xxxx. This is because the review of the literature is not thorough for study of xxxx; because the author only referred to two articles which were published in 2014 and 2007, which has a big gap almost 10 years. The author did not critically review xxxx in the Introduction. This helps to show that this parameter is important to characterize xxxx. The details of my comments and suggestions are attached with this reviewer comments. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料考研调剂
已经有25人回复
-
材料工程281还有调剂机会吗
已经有11人回复
-
303求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
290调剂生物0860
已经有14人回复
-
农学0904 312求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
11408。358求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
求助调剂，跨调
已经有8人回复
-
271求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿厦大0856，306求调剂
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 【转】裸奔的Barabasi
已经有10人回复
slc0716
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1439.2
- 散金: 432
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 1092
- 在线: 135.6小时
- 虫号: 1689118
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 专业: 活体与复杂样品分析
2楼2017-09-01 17:38:02
linsoklove
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2259.7
- 散金: 7930
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 2022
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 3386277
- 注册: 2014-08-28
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
3楼2017-09-01 18:13:46
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿
4楼2017-09-01 18:22:34
5楼2017-09-01 22:01:02
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-09-01 23:18:14
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
7楼2017-09-01 23:18:35
caomaoguan
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 2086.1
- 散金: 743
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 675
- 在线: 433.7小时
- 虫号: 4431683
- 注册: 2016-02-24
- 专业: 电力系统
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
linsoklove: 金币+80, ★★★很有帮助 2017-09-02 09:46:32
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
linsoklove: 金币+80, ★★★很有帮助 2017-09-02 09:46:32
| 看意见，只要是能把审稿人1给说服了，问题就不大，多和导师商量一下怎么从专业的角度回应审稿人1。审稿人2给的意见很宏观，个人感觉可能是你行文的问题，没有在introduction里把自己的创新点突出出来，还有就是引用的文献不够，2的意见相对好改。全文改好后，建议最后完善下abstract，一阵见血地点出innovation，让人能一下子抓到你的创新点。只要你努力去改了，审稿人和编辑会看到你的诚意的，加油祝福！ |
8楼2017-09-02 09:29:56
linsoklove
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2259.7
- 散金: 7930
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 2022
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 3386277
- 注册: 2014-08-28
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
9楼2017-09-02 09:46:38
linsoklove
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2259.7
- 散金: 7930
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 2022
- 在线: 186.6小时
- 虫号: 3386277
- 注册: 2014-08-28
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
10楼2017-09-02 09:54:17
