24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 16887  |  回复: 25
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

juesyr

铜虫 (初入文坛)


[交流] ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT 投稿经验分享

附上时间进度以供参考
2017.06.05 Submitted to journal
2017.06.08 Under review
2017.06.29 Under editor evaluation
2017.07.08 Revise
(没有表明大修还是小修,编辑给了24天,应该是大修;一共四个审稿人:一个没有意见,两个是修改,共15条意见,还算好改,一个审稿人不推荐发表(),编辑给了5条意见。
所有修改意见主要集中在引言对创新性叙述不清晰,文中所述方法对比分析不够全面。
全部按照审稿人意见修改,并添加了对不推荐发表的审稿人的长长回复)
2017.08.01 Revision submitted to journal
2017.08.02 With editor
2017.08.03 Under review
2017.08.23 Required Reviews Completed
2017.08.24 Revise
(没有表明大修还是小修,这次编辑给了两周,感觉是小修。
两个问题,一天搞定,又拖了两天回复,想给编辑留下好印象)
2017.08.28 Revision submitted to journal
2017.08.28 Accept
杂志效率特别高,从投稿到接受一共85天,其中在手里修改一个月,两次外审都是21天回来,文章在编辑手里基本不拖。
感觉该杂志对引言和研究内容的完整性和创新性要求较高,而对语言水平要求一般(没有对论文提出进一步润色要求,高兴!)。并且,对文章的写作格式、参考文献格式也没有硬性要求,自由度较高。

下面附上两次修改过程的编辑意见,以供参考,对比可知有些话是套路,有些话能反映编辑对文章的态度:
(1)Thank you for sending the manuscript/revised manuscript "论文名字" to Energy Conversion and Management for publication. I apologize for the lengthy period of review.  The review is now complete, and unfortunately, it is not completely favorable.  Therefore, the paper cannot be published in Energy Conversion and Management as it is presented.
I have received detailed and thorough comments on your paper from four esteemed referees. As you can see from the reviews below, one well-established reviewer expresses serious concerns about this manuscript and has come to the conclusion that this work should not be published in the Journal. I have gone over the reviews very carefully, and I think the referees have raised a number of concerns. However, I would like to give you an opportunity to fully address, point-by-point, all the issues raised by the reviewers.
。。。。。。。具体意见 。。。。。。
I hope these comments will be helpful to you.  My sense of the reviewers' comments is that there is a very good basis on which I can recommend that this paper be modified in a responsive manner to the comments above.  If the modification is done carefully and completely, upon re-submission and evaluation, I think you can be confident that the paper will be accepted for publication in Energy Conversion and Management.  Thank you again for sending this paper to Energy Conversion and Management for consideration.
(2)Thank you for sending the manuscript/revised manuscript, "Development and Validation of a Marine Sequential Turbocharging Diesel Engine Combustion Model Based on Double Wiebe Function and Partial Least Squares Method" to Energy Conversion and Management for publication.  I apologize for the lengthy period of review. The review is now complete, and unfortunately, it is not completely favorable. Therefore, the paper cannot be published in Energy Conversion and Management as it is presented.
。。。。。。。具体意见 。。。。。。
I hope these comments will be helpful to you. My sense of the reviewers' comments is that there is a very good basis on which I can recommend that this paper be modified in a responsive manner to the comments above.
回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)


本帖仅楼主可见
7楼2017-08-29 16:43:19
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
查看全部 26 个回答

wyq176

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



juesyr(金币+1): 谢谢参与
厉害!谢谢!

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2017-08-29 16:05:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)



juesyr(金币+1): 谢谢参与
本帖仅楼主可见
5楼2017-08-29 16:42:37
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

vincent_hpax

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)



juesyr(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ECM效率确实高,编辑的那一大段基本都是套话。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
9楼2017-08-29 17:07:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
free_zi2楼
2017-08-29 15:57   回复  
juesyr(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2017-08-29 16:43   回复  
juesyr(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2017-08-29 16:03   回复  
juesyr(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +3 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 3/150 2026-08-13 06:40 by 玲珑133
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +8 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 23/1150 2026-08-13 00:35 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +10 Tide man 2026-08-11 10/500 2026-08-12 20:59 by 陈晨晨陈啊
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +5 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 6/300 2026-08-12 16:26 by Tide man
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +5 布布和一二 2026-08-08 6/300 2026-08-12 16:11 by 云上清扬
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +3 majunge000 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-11 20:13 by lch2012
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +3 lnee 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 18:10 by 希望我好好的
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +8 家与远方 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 09:49 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来 +17 且听虎啸 2026-08-07 24/1200 2026-08-10 18:35 by zhangduo2008
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +5 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 16/800 2026-08-10 17:19 by Tide man
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-09 16:15 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
[基金申请] 关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量 +5 yang182083 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-08 18:29 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率 +7 a089 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-08 18:05 by gltch
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 大家散了吧,后缀研究没有意义,别浪费时间了,过好目前的每一天,不要焦虑 +5 Tide man 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-07 13:11 by 医学老男孩
信息提示
请填处理意见