| 查看: 2390 | 回复: 4 | |||
[交流]
求助，编辑部回复意见什么意思，是小修吗，第一次投稿没有经验。 已有2人参与
|
|
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The topic of the manuscript has practical significance in many areas such as the coal mining and soft rock mining industry. The authors conducted a series of experiments based on the actual geological conditions. Then, the interaction between cracks, stress field and seepage field in floor rocks was studied. Finally, the evolutions of water inrush from floor cracks were obtained, and the monitoring of rock stress and seepage pressure were realized by virtue of sensors. The manuscript is well written and the obtained conclusions are useful. However, some of the details of the experiments are still not clear. Therefore, a revised version is suggested to improve the quality of the manuscript. Specific comments include: 1. Please explain with more details in the way to allow readers to have an insight of how the experimental procedures could have influenced in the results. Besides, the manuscript should provide some qualitative data on both the processes involved and the experimental apparatus, such as those presented Fig. 10. 3. There are no references to the principles of dimensional analysis and similitude that are the foundation of physical model studies. Please add some relevant content Reviewer #2: In this paper, the interaction between cracks, stress field and seepage field in floor rocks was studied by physical simulation, the evolution law of water inrush from floor cracks was obtained under the fluid-solid coupling effect, and the monitoring of rock stress and seepage pressure was realized by virtue of soil pressure and pore pressure sensors. This is a good study and its publication will be beneficial for scientific community and will add to the existing knowledge of the coal mining; similarity test; complete floor; confined water; visualization. This paper can be accepted for publication, if the following recommendations are incorporated: Conclusion: * Should be revised by including some findings with numeric results, not just explaining in general. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有6人回复
-
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有6人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有14人回复
-
求合成方法
已经有8人回复
-
师弟论文见刊大半年才想起来申请专利，还能抢救一下吗？
已经有4人回复
-
有机合成以后会不会被AI改变？做科研的虫友怎么看
已经有8人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- SCI投稿过程总结
已经有124人回复
ipublish_SCI 
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 应助: 178 (高中生)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 232
- 红花: 24
- 帖子: 399
- 在线: 104.9小时
- 虫号: 7056251
- 注册: 2017-08-13
- 专业: 生物大分子结构与功能
★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-16 09:39:11
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-16 09:39:11
|
Minor issues!. This is very easy! If you write a simple response letter and change a little the manuscript it should be accepted immediately. If you want more help, send me a message, perhaps with other information. Your paper is almost published!. Best |
2楼2017-08-16 08:45:39
3楼2017-08-16 09:40:40
ipublish_SCI
捐助贵宾 (正式写手)
- 应助: 178 (高中生)
- 金币: 10.2
- 散金: 232
- 红花: 24
- 帖子: 399
- 在线: 104.9小时
- 虫号: 7056251
- 注册: 2017-08-13
- 专业: 生物大分子结构与功能
4楼2017-08-16 09:49:14
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
5楼2017-08-16 23:18:53