| 查看: 305 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
求助翻译
|
|||
|
Single-molecule imaging in live cells Owing to their high photobleaching threshold and the large separation between the excitation and emission spectra, QDs provide a very high signal-to-noise ratio, making them suitable for the long-term tracking of single molecules [12]. However, many of the approaches used to distinguish whether or not a signal comes from a single fluorophore, such as single-step photobleaching, cannot be applied to QDs owing to high photostability. The use of another diagnostic approach, FLUORESCENCE BLINKING of a single QD under continuous wave illumina- tion, is also hindered by the sensitivity of QD blinking to changes in excitation intensity [40], temperature [41] and the surrounding environment [42]. These features alter blinking characteristics to the extent of eliminating blinking under some conditions, such as those found in a reducing environment [43]. Because the cellular environ- ment is highly reducing, it could potentially make blinking a poor criterion for identifying single QDs in live cells. In addition, unlike organic dyes, for which the blinking interval is about 0.5 ms [44], for QDs this interval is around 500 ms [40]. In fact, it has been recently reported that this interval could be asmuch as 100 s for commercially available avidin-conjugated QDs [43]. Such a long inter- mittency will prevent the use of QDs to track single molecules in the cytoplasm of live cells where they diffuse at about 3 mm2 /s [45]. The above features limit the ability to establish when a single QD molecule is being observed. The multivalency of currently available QD bioconju- gates further precludes their use for labeling only a single molecule in live cells (Figure 2d,e). This is a major impediment to studying single molecules because it can result in a change in the behavior and even functionality of the molecules. Nevertheless, the ability of QDs to avoid photodamage and metabolic degradation, their high quantum yield and the potential to develop approaches to label single molecules without affecting their function- ality provide the motivation to design QDs and to develop imaging strategies that will overcome these limitations. |
» 猜你喜欢
全日制(定向)博士
已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有10人回复
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法,现在跑or等等看?
已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
参与限项
已经有3人回复
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站,青基依托单位怎么办?
已经有12人回复
所感
已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博?
已经有7人回复
cam967
金虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 21
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1146.8
- 散金: 330
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 1082
- 在线: 268.7小时
- 虫号: 549628
- 注册: 2008-04-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子,纳米,生物
活细胞单分子成像
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
tong5028(金币+12):THANK YOU~~ 1-17 23:04
tong5028(金币+12):THANK YOU~~ 1-17 23:04
|
因为QDs(量子点超敏荧光试剂盒)光褪色临界值高,激发和发射光谱容易分离,所以它的信噪比很高,非常适于长期追踪单分子。 但是,由于QDs光稳定性好,许多用于区分信号是否来自单个荧光团的方法(如一步光褪色法)是不能用于QD的。 另一种检测方法-荧光闪烁法,也因QD荧光闪烁对激发密度,温度,和周边环境都很敏感无法有效检测。这些因素有时甚至会使荧光闪烁消失,比如在还原性环境中。 而细胞环境具有很高还原性,所以荧光闪烁法是不合适的。 此外,和有机化合物不同,他们的闪烁间隔只有0.5ms,QD的闪烁间隔在500ms左右。事实上,已经商业化的抗生物素蛋白-QD的闪烁间隔为100s.这么长的闪烁间隔会使QD无法跟踪细胞质中的单分子,因为单分子的扩散速度为3 mm2/s 上述这些因素,使确定单分子开始发射信号的时间成为难题。 目前生物-QD由于具有多重化合价,使的QD在活性细胞标记单分子变得更加困难。这是目前研究单分子的最大障碍,因为多化合价会影响分子的行为甚至功能。 不过,由于QD可以避免光破坏和金属降解,量子产额高,以及跟踪单分子却不影响单分子功能的潜力,激励我们去开发QD,并采用新的方法去克服这些弱点 |
7楼2009-01-17 16:36:20
尾巴色狼
木虫 (正式写手)
风的音符
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1446.3
- 散金: 681
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 429
- 在线: 36.4小时
- 虫号: 689106
- 注册: 2009-01-07
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型

2楼2009-01-17 13:33:15
尾巴色狼
木虫 (正式写手)
风的音符
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1446.3
- 散金: 681
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 429
- 在线: 36.4小时
- 虫号: 689106
- 注册: 2009-01-07
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型

3楼2009-01-17 14:13:02
尾巴色狼
木虫 (正式写手)
风的音符
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1446.3
- 散金: 681
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 429
- 在线: 36.4小时
- 虫号: 689106
- 注册: 2009-01-07
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型

4楼2009-01-17 14:13:48












回复此楼
下回有机会吧!没时间了