24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 11625  |  回复: 13

xiaguoqiang

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] energies这个期刊有人投过没? 意见回来了,两个审稿人,大家看看希望大不?已有9人参与

第一个审稿人:
English language and style ( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
(x) Moderate English changes required
( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style
Yes        Can be improved        Must be improved        Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Is the research design appropriate?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the methods adequately described?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the results clearly presented?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
1) The article concerns a well-known method used in assessment of quality of paper-oil insualtion of transformers - FDS. The title indicates that the authors focused their work only on fundamental studies without deep analysis of the special factors which are developed by the authors in order to improve the FDS method. From this point of view I suggest to consider another title of the paper - more proper to the studies presented. 2) I have also a lot of doubts in relation to the Abstract. The presented conclusions from the experimental stuides are very obvious (well-known in the literature) so the authors should mention this fact. This is not a novelity which range of frequency in FDS method is responsible for which effect in paper-oil insulation. The rest of the abstract may be accepted. 3) In general the first part of the paper (Section 3.1) brings no novelity and could be presented in more limited range. I suggest to point out, in presentation of conclusions from this part of the studies, that the authors' observations are in accordance to the knowledge in the field of FDS method. You can relate your studies to the important documents in this field like: Cigre Brochure no 349: Moisture equilibrium and moisture migration within transformer insulation systems, June 2008 and Cigre Brochure no 414: Dielectric Response Diagnoses For Transformer Windings, April 2010 Minor comments: In formula (2) epsilon prim and epsilon bis are introduced but they are not described. It is obvious what they mean but for non-profesional readers it must be clearly explained. Section 2.2: Use three-electrode system rather than three electrode (with space between three and electrode) The sentence starting from "Then, in order to prevent..." is really difficult to understand. Please rewrite it. The sentence starting from "The instrument ...": use "Analyzer of ..." Section 3: What does it mean that oil and paper were set to 20:1 ratio? Please present this aspect more clearly. Use days not abbreviation "d" in description of aging days in the text. The sentence starting from :The moisture content of ..." is not gramathical. Section 3.3 / 3.3.1 3.3.2 - there are no capitals in the in titles of Sections Use "Table presents..." rather than "Table is..." (It is not gramathically corrected) In general there are some typos and grammar. Please read the text of the article carefully and correct them.

第二个审稿人:
English language and style ( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
(x) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style
Yes        Can be improved        Must be improved        Not applicable
Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?        ( )        ( )        (x)        ( )
Is the research design appropriate?        ( )        (x)        ( )        ( )
Are the methods adequately described?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Are the results clearly presented?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Are the conclusions supported by the results?        (x)        ( )        ( )        ( )
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Dear authors,



I would like to congratulate you for a very good paper. I recommend the paper for publication.

However, I have several comments and suggestions that I consider of interest for improving the paper:



I kindly suggest to detail what are terms such as Sm, SPD, gamma and phi in the abstract although you have mentioned them in the body text. Besides, could you explain more in detail this sentence "could eliminate the internal influence between moisture and aging degree." in the abstract?



I consider that the introduction should be improved and additional papers should be discussed comparing your research with more previous ones.



For example, which are the main differences between your work and others such as:

"Field experiences with measurements of dielectric response in frequency domain for power transformer diagnostics," in IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 681-688, April 2006. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2005.861231

Regarding "the remaining life of the transformer largely depends on the insulation status of ol-paper" why not to talk about partial discharges and to include references from mdpi and other journals, not only about partial discharges, but also regarding remaining life of power transformers, statistical data, etc.



About your sentence "The aging degree of oil paper insulation will directly determine the service life of the transformer, when the aging degree reaches to a certain extent, the transformer insulation will be completely ineffective." Why not to talk about breakdown and its consequences?



Due to you are analyzing the combined effect of moisture and aging, you must compare your proposal with others more in details such as those mentioned below and/or others:

"A moisture-in-oil model for power transformer monitoring - Part I: Theoretical foundation," in IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1417-1422, April 2005.
doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.832366



"Diffusion coefficient in transformer pressboard insulation part 2: mineral oil impregnated," in IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 394-402, February 2014.

"Determination of moisture diffusion coefficient for oil-impregnated Kraft-paper insulation, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Volume 53, December 2013, Pages 279-286, ISSN 0142-0615, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.05.011.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061513002032)



MC should be defined in Table 2 and the rest of terms such as A0 should be referenced as samples in the text.

When you are using low-frequency and high-frequency, please describe in a table which ranges of frequencies correspond with these bands, due to in i.e. radio spectrum, it refers to very different ranges.

Discuss more in detail the sentence "therefore, in evaluating aging degree and moisture content, the assessment method can not only take individual factor into account and ignore the impact between the two."

Minor comments

Please, include all units for parameters in all Equations

oil-paper instead oil paper

high-frequency instead high frequency

high-level

Equation instead equation or formula

Fourier instead fourier

check the spelling:

the tanδ curve mainly affect by moisture content, while

has a unique (an)

3.3.2. (A)ging

When you refers to a section, such as 3.1.1 or 3.2 please write "section 3.1.1"
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

lito7989

木虫 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-06-11 21:25:32
逐条回答,逻辑要清楚,有理有据,就能中,给修就是给机会!

发自小木虫Android客户端
今天的自己是昨天的结果
2楼2017-06-11 17:05:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaguoqiang

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by lito7989 at 2017-06-11 17:05:56
逐条回答,逻辑要清楚,有理有据,就能中,给修就是给机会!

谢谢,我没有修改过,每一条修改完都要解释吗,还是直接说见文中哪里?

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2017-06-11 17:34:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Genius_tc

铜虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问投这个期刊,需要多钱呢?
13楼2018-04-10 08:46:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖
4楼2017-06-11 20:35:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小蚂蚁335

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
命中率挺高的,好好改,加油

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2017-06-11 20:54:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

QX_1992

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问楼主energies一审用了多久?
6楼2017-06-22 09:11:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

风尘71

银虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
好好修,肯定没问题。
7楼2017-06-22 09:39:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaguoqiang

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by QX_1992 at 2017-06-22 09:11:04
请问楼主energies一审用了多久?

1审两个月

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2017-07-08 23:56:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaohuli860

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问楼主结果如何?
9楼2017-08-02 10:01:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaguoqiang

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by xiaohuli860 at 2017-08-02 10:01:33
请问楼主结果如何?

第三次小修刚回,审稿人都同意录用,学术编辑的修改

发自小木虫IOS客户端
10楼2017-08-02 15:15:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xiaguoqiang 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 会评结束后还会查验代表作吗? +15 kobe0107 2024-07-17 33/1650 2024-07-19 09:49 by 流流伤
[高分子] 丙烯酸树脂Tg点 +4 微纳材料 2024-07-17 4/200 2024-07-19 09:34 by jiduquegai
[基金申请] 青拔答辩通过率 +11 wuxiacl 2024-07-18 12/600 2024-07-19 09:26 by wawljwalj
[基金申请] 终于能安心带孩子出去浪半个月 +46 zqj3102112 2024-07-16 49/2450 2024-07-19 09:16 by FUNNY小皮
[基金申请] 工材口今天开始会评了吧? +9 降温器 2024-07-15 9/450 2024-07-19 00:17 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 信息F口会评顺序 +18 天锁斩月! 2024-07-17 22/1100 2024-07-18 22:48 by 临川树荫
[基金申请] 范F01 +3 我要博 2024-07-18 3/150 2024-07-18 22:11 by 夕阳的刻痕1
[硕博家园] 帮儿子找对象,土著181-78-qs前十博士 +15 不知道起啥名 2024-07-13 15/750 2024-07-18 17:04 by crystalboy78
[访问学者] 有去德国访学的吗? +3 pu117700 2024-07-12 8/400 2024-07-18 15:21 by 大力cqj
[微生物] 求求告知生长曲线到底才能准确测定啊 +3 No停步 2024-07-17 5/250 2024-07-18 14:31 by 阿鹿alt
[教师之家] 从A高校跳槽到B高校,B高校认可2年内在A高校取得的成果。普遍是这样? +10 河西夜郎 2024-07-16 11/550 2024-07-18 14:13 by jzhang_cs
[硕博家园] 余承东称优秀的人最大不同是自控力 +7 sjx128128 2024-07-16 7/350 2024-07-18 10:14 by zyqchem
[有机交流] 氯化亚锡还原硝基 10+3 jie737 2024-07-17 4/200 2024-07-18 09:08 by lsk0119
[基金申请] +10 yatou 2024-07-15 10/500 2024-07-18 03:11 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] E02青基到底几个评审专家呀? +3 他山攻玉之石 2024-07-16 4/200 2024-07-17 19:35 by 他山攻玉之石
[基金申请] 国青基会评E05 +7 wang-nuaa 2024-07-16 10/500 2024-07-17 19:26 by chuguogou
[考博] 25申博求博导推荐 +4 梨柚甜酒 2024-07-16 7/350 2024-07-17 19:21 by 安塔瓦拉多
[有机交流] 1,2-二溴乙烷 5+3 青空31 2024-07-14 4/200 2024-07-16 15:25 by zyp0009928
[教师之家] 迷茫 (金币+5) +8 水冰月月野兔 2024-07-12 9/450 2024-07-15 09:14 by Quakerbird
[硕博家园] 招聘科研助理 +3 不许选择 2024-07-14 7/350 2024-07-14 19:39 by szyang
信息提示
请填处理意见