24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5642  |  回复: 30

NZZZ

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 第一投稿SCI,收到审稿意见,求大家参谋下已有5人参与

本人第一次投稿SCI,期刊Measurement Science and Technology,力传感器方向,三个月收到编辑部邮件Major Revision ,其中有两个审稿人。看了下审稿意见感觉第一个审稿人意见比较认可,第二个提了21条意见感觉不太友善啊而且好多意见看的不是太懂。心里没底求大家给看看。
Referee: 1

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR(S)
The authors in this paper have presented a measurement model of over-constrained parallel six-dimensional force sensor based on stiffness characteristics analysis. The sensing system becomes more and more important these days because of the necessity of manned operations. That is reflected in the explosion of papers in the recent past. This paper designed a new six-dimensional force sensor based on over-constrained parallel mechanism, which is interesting and helpful.

What has been noticed is that there are a very large number of English language mistakes that have to be thoroughly checked and corrected. It is necessary that thorough English correction is needed.
I think that the Fig.1 and Fig.2 should be combined.
The gap of the spherical joint connection structure could influence the performance of the force sensor, and I suggest that the authors should analysis it.
The authors should add some comparison between the results of numerical example and calibration experiment (fig. 5 and fig. 10).
  Regarding the application of force sensor, the following article should be cited:
[1] PM based multi-component F/T sensors—State of the art and trends[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 29(4): 1-7.
[2] Design and Sensitivity Analysis Simulation of a Novel 3D Force Sensor Based on a Parallel Mechanism[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(12): 2147.

Referee: 2

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR(S)
Authors review relevant literature, and describe first a general class of 6-dimensional over-constrained force sensor. They describe in great length their matrix algebra implementation of the stiffness and crosstalk model, and give a lengthy numerical example before introducing  the sensor prototype actually built, which seems to have different geometry as the examples. A (re-) calibration-type experiment is performed where the measurement model’s numerical values are updated to get higher accuracy.
Notes on the article draft:
1.        What is  "FS" and “class error I/II” (should be class I/II error ?)  (describe/ref if not very common knowledge in the area...)  if it is full scale, it would also be nice to know the relative error with smaller than near  full scale forces?
2.        Describe somehow calibration system metrological traceability, and how the sensor was calibrated before the “calibration experiment” to get the stiffnesses, crosstalks etc. or not at all ? what was the possible difference in the calibration methods, can you show clear before-after comparisons
3.        in fig 3 could i and n be just one branch instead of 2, some extra white gaps in the figure 1 and 3?
4.        Fig 3 needed separately at all ? maybe.
5.        fig 4 is not easy to relate to the CAD/photo. Are the angles in table 1 correct? considering the values of I R_1, R_2 and H ..  so the example is for different geometry than the produced sensor but, same kind of measurement model can be applied ? why 10 branches in figure instead of 12? they would fit ....
6.        Table 2 Output force of the "three kinds of measurement model" make more clear what are the three models, and what is called “simulation”
7.        Too much equations (ok, measurement model good to see, but make more concise? )  , indexing choices etc not too important? - can eg. refer to somewhere or describe some equations just in the text ...
8.        label branches to photos/CAD pictures ?
9.        How does ball joint picture relate to the spokes – clear enough?
10.        How the force sensors were read in the experiment ?
11.        Individual branches flex (stiffness) or the connections from loading plate to contact plate ?
12.        put whitespace between number and percent sign
13.        "The preliminary values of the structural parameters are provided in Table 1." . what preliminary means here?
14.        Abstract/intro: Where in the field of aerospace is this needed  
15.        Perhaps make clear the sensor has 4 Z-sensors/branches instead of two visible in the CAD picture etc. branches 1,2,3,4 are the vertical ones?
17.        symbols are not the same as the legend in the fig 5a
18.        description of error classes is maybe too late in the article text.
19.        Describe how/why How the experimental results verified the theoretical model.
20.        Not needed to show all the Err matrices?
21.        Can it be called “orthogonal parallel” ..
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

雪汐雪

新虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-05-27 17:31:18
但是其实越具体的意见越好回复的~
11楼2017-05-23 16:16:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Chem. Albert

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

★ ★
NZZZ(liouzhan654代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-05-23 14:33:20
引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by NZZZ at 2017-05-23 12:35:10
第二个审稿人给了21条意见,课题室师兄的SCI都没收到过这么多意见,因此心里好没底...

我们曾收到过近30条的意见,返修说明几十页;
建议:
好好回答、逐一回复、认真完善;
只要答复有理有据,不用太过担心;
编辑给了修改的机会,就说明对paper有认同;

祝顺利!
8楼2017-05-23 12:45:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Chem. Albert

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by NZZZ at 2017-05-23 20:11:45
They describe in great length their matrix algebra implementation of the stiffness and crosstalk model, and give a lengthy numerical example before introducing  the sensor prototype actually built,  ...

是否理解:
1,对串扰模型、刚度模型(stiffness and crosstalk model)的“矩阵代数”(matrix algebra implementation)描述内容介绍太多;
2,在实质性建立sensor prototype之前,列出了大量的numerical example,导致理解偏差、表述不清晰:即,which seems to have different geometry as the examples(different geometry这个术语不太清楚怎么表述,不同几何图形?)?
-------可能简要理解为,前面的例证太多、过于宽泛而不精准,导致读者理解有偏差;

非专业,可能只能理解浅显的含义。
15楼2017-05-23 23:41:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

chendengyi

铁虫 (正式写手)


sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-05-27 17:31:24
2楼2017-05-23 11:50:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

NZZZ

新虫 (初入文坛)

是不少,心里忐忑

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2017-05-23 12:13:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lglsr603

禁虫 (正式写手)


sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-05-27 17:31:31
本帖内容被屏蔽

4楼2017-05-23 12:22:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Chem. Albert

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-05-27 17:31:37
NZZZ: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2017-06-06 03:32:19
希望咨询哪一条?
重点哪些意见不太清楚喃?
5楼2017-05-23 12:24:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

NZZZ

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by lglsr603 at 2017-05-23 12:22:53
意见看上去不错呀

第二个审稿人给了21条,心里没底
6楼2017-05-23 12:33:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

NZZZ

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by Chem. Albert at 2017-05-23 12:24:30
希望咨询哪一条?
重点哪些意见不太清楚喃?

第二个审稿人给了21条意见,课题室师兄的SCI都没收到过这么多意见,因此心里好没底
7楼2017-05-23 12:35:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

NZZZ

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by Chem. Albert at 2017-05-23 12:45:36
我们曾收到过近30条的意见,返修说明几十页;
建议:
好好回答、逐一回复、认真完善;
只要答复有理有据,不用太过担心;
编辑给了修改的机会,就说明对paper有认同;

祝顺利!...

谢谢您!认真逐条修改吧。
9楼2017-05-23 13:51:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (小有名气)


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sesame_oil: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-05-27 17:34:35
本帖仅楼主可见
10楼2017-05-23 13:54:07
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 NZZZ 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 带C均不上会。函审建议不资助的会评投票信息中不在显示 +32 dream200606 2024-07-12 40/2000 2024-07-12 19:40 by Cathyau
[教师之家] 上64节课 VS 带 七八个本科毕业论文,哪个省心? +7 河西夜郎 2024-07-12 8/400 2024-07-12 19:29 by sxmsxm10
[基金申请] 各学部会评时间已公布 +3 zhailichao 2024-07-12 3/150 2024-07-12 19:22 by 6543yes
[基金申请] 大佬们,工材面上几号会评啊 +6 牛棕色左右 2024-07-11 6/300 2024-07-12 19:13 by 旋风马
[基金申请] 2024国家社科评审交流帖 +15 zyl_001 2024-07-07 28/1400 2024-07-12 18:56 by zyl_001
[基金申请] 国自然各学部会评时间 +5 星星大锤 2024-07-12 6/300 2024-07-12 18:18 by 十比
[基金申请] 先开贴,今年数理口需要什么样的涵评分数以及文章才能上会? +14 北尘心 2024-07-09 27/1350 2024-07-12 12:18 by kaoyan250
[论文投稿] 论文投稿迟迟得不到回复(3个月了) +4 无。忌 2024-07-09 10/500 2024-07-12 11:01 by 17612199562
[基金申请] 愿青年基金得中,证明自己能力 +14 xiao1994 2024-07-06 14/700 2024-07-12 08:56 by 学大生物
[基金申请] 有没有A口流体力学的朋友 +12 不是233 2024-07-10 20/1000 2024-07-12 06:11 by kobe0107
[无机/物化] 怎么制备一价铜溶液 (金币+5) +5 卢本伟er 2024-07-08 11/550 2024-07-11 17:40 by czyzsu
[基金申请] 为基金祈福 +4 阿呆不呆 2024-07-09 9/450 2024-07-11 13:37 by 上善若水 cc
[考研] 二战 +6 jscc. 2024-07-06 6/300 2024-07-11 11:17 by liuyupu132
[基金申请] 什么时候放榜?? +6 zj7115 2024-07-10 7/350 2024-07-11 05:56 by 我是理想国王小
[基金申请] 博后基金特别资助什么时候给资助证明? +4 much_peace 2024-07-09 5/250 2024-07-09 19:17 by much_peace
[基金申请] 化学B口青年啥时候会评么? +8 Adhfjf 2024-07-06 9/450 2024-07-09 14:04 by 阿福2016
[基金申请] 经管类人工智能交叉方向,基金屡次不中,难 +14 新一2223 2024-07-06 21/1050 2024-07-09 10:17 by 新一2223
[基金申请] 化学B01青年基金已经会评完了,有知道今年B01青年基金的上会标准吗? +6 salmon95 2024-07-06 9/450 2024-07-09 08:55 by salmon95
[基金申请] 请问生命口面上哪天评啊 +7 残月锁漪 2024-07-06 10/500 2024-07-07 20:37 by 残月锁漪
[基金申请] 祈福 +4 maicaokouzi 2024-07-06 4/200 2024-07-07 00:03 by 人在低处亦高歌
信息提示
请填处理意见