| 查看: 1422 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者我是东成西就将赠送您 50 个金币 | |||
[求助]
此审稿意见如何回复？ 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
本人最近一篇论文返回审稿意见，两个审稿人，审稿意见如下，第一个意见比较积极，第二个意见给的是拒稿。请问各位虫友，第二个审稿人的第二条意见如何回复？ Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 (Major Revisions) - *** for universal application was obtained by using *** analysis. *** and *** were discussed for the ***. A selection guide was finally given for different *** parameters. In general, this manuscript has been organized well and some positive and original fruits are provided. However, some major revisions need to be done prior to consideration of publishing in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. The main comments are listed as follows: (1) Better summarize for the abstract and conclusion should be made. Make a simplification of the abstract, and keep to the point. (2) In Fig.1, the direction of vw is wrong. (3) In Fig.1 the “*** with a possible profile should be set on the finished surface, I think this would change the coordinate of this profile and therefore change the related equations. If you insist to make the offset of the profile as you did in Fig.1, you should make a better explanation for this. (4) You made a good literature review at the beginning of this paper, however, you didn’t made any comparison between your results and the literatures. (5) Validation should be made for the *** analysis method you used. -Reviewer 2 (Reject) - This paper researched on the *** analysis for obtaining the ***, and the trend of the *** was investigated by changing the *** and the ***. The *** is more convenient compared with the ***. As author mentioned, many researchers study on numerical models of ***. Some comments follow: 1. “Introduction, Literature review” are too long, and it should be concise as a research paper 2. In third section, the establishment process and most equations are same/similar with your accepted paper “***". 3. The Eq.3 is same Eq.2, The Eq.15 is same Eq4, and the Table 3 is insignificant. How did you obtained the Eq.17? 4. In forth section, authors should analyze the reasons of the changing trend of *** and the different with ***. 5. In Fig.2,3,4,5,6, just only heat source profile f(ζ) is analyzed by changing *** and the ***, how about the temperature field T(x,z)? Please give the values of parameters: ae, vw. 6. Author should perform some experiment to verify and analysis your model for meeting the level of this Journal. 第二个审稿人的第二条意见认为，文章里面用到的求profile的公式与我之前已经被录用的一篇文章很相似。事实上求解方法确实很相似（当然不是抄袭，公式也不是完全相同），现在这篇论文与已被录用论文用到的求解方法都不是本人原创，都是采用已被发表的方法，我也已经引用了该方法的来源文献。该方法相当于是计算工具，我的这篇论文采用与已被录用论文同样的计算方法，来研究不同的问题。 请问各位虫友，该如何回复第二个审稿人的第二条意见？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有45人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有14人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有11人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有4人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有8人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有37人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有9人回复
-
请教兼职经验
已经有3人回复
-
职称评审，求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊
已经有5人回复
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2017-05-15 18:41:27
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.5小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2017-05-15 23:56:50
