| 查看: 1419 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者我是东成西就将赠送您 50 个金币 | |||
[求助]
此审稿意见如何回复？ 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
本人最近一篇论文返回审稿意见，两个审稿人，审稿意见如下，第一个意见比较积极，第二个意见给的是拒稿。请问各位虫友，第二个审稿人的第二条意见如何回复？ Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 (Major Revisions) - *** for universal application was obtained by using *** analysis. *** and *** were discussed for the ***. A selection guide was finally given for different *** parameters. In general, this manuscript has been organized well and some positive and original fruits are provided. However, some major revisions need to be done prior to consideration of publishing in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. The main comments are listed as follows: (1) Better summarize for the abstract and conclusion should be made. Make a simplification of the abstract, and keep to the point. (2) In Fig.1, the direction of vw is wrong. (3) In Fig.1 the “*** with a possible profile should be set on the finished surface, I think this would change the coordinate of this profile and therefore change the related equations. If you insist to make the offset of the profile as you did in Fig.1, you should make a better explanation for this. (4) You made a good literature review at the beginning of this paper, however, you didn’t made any comparison between your results and the literatures. (5) Validation should be made for the *** analysis method you used. -Reviewer 2 (Reject) - This paper researched on the *** analysis for obtaining the ***, and the trend of the *** was investigated by changing the *** and the ***. The *** is more convenient compared with the ***. As author mentioned, many researchers study on numerical models of ***. Some comments follow: 1. “Introduction, Literature review” are too long, and it should be concise as a research paper 2. In third section, the establishment process and most equations are same/similar with your accepted paper “***". 3. The Eq.3 is same Eq.2, The Eq.15 is same Eq4, and the Table 3 is insignificant. How did you obtained the Eq.17? 4. In forth section, authors should analyze the reasons of the changing trend of *** and the different with ***. 5. In Fig.2,3,4,5,6, just only heat source profile f(ζ) is analyzed by changing *** and the ***, how about the temperature field T(x,z)? Please give the values of parameters: ae, vw. 6. Author should perform some experiment to verify and analysis your model for meeting the level of this Journal. 第二个审稿人的第二条意见认为，文章里面用到的求profile的公式与我之前已经被录用的一篇文章很相似。事实上求解方法确实很相似（当然不是抄袭，公式也不是完全相同），现在这篇论文与已被录用论文用到的求解方法都不是本人原创，都是采用已被发表的方法，我也已经引用了该方法的来源文献。该方法相当于是计算工具，我的这篇论文采用与已被录用论文同样的计算方法，来研究不同的问题。 请问各位虫友，该如何回复第二个审稿人的第二条意见？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
关于filecode，很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
-
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
-
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有3人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有7人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2017-05-15 18:41:27
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.5小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2017-05-15 23:56:50
