| 查看: 1429 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者我是东成西就将赠送您 50 个金币 | |||
[求助]
此审稿意见如何回复？ 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
本人最近一篇论文返回审稿意见，两个审稿人，审稿意见如下，第一个意见比较积极，第二个意见给的是拒稿。请问各位虫友，第二个审稿人的第二条意见如何回复？ Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 (Major Revisions) - *** for universal application was obtained by using *** analysis. *** and *** were discussed for the ***. A selection guide was finally given for different *** parameters. In general, this manuscript has been organized well and some positive and original fruits are provided. However, some major revisions need to be done prior to consideration of publishing in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. The main comments are listed as follows: (1) Better summarize for the abstract and conclusion should be made. Make a simplification of the abstract, and keep to the point. (2) In Fig.1, the direction of vw is wrong. (3) In Fig.1 the “*** with a possible profile should be set on the finished surface, I think this would change the coordinate of this profile and therefore change the related equations. If you insist to make the offset of the profile as you did in Fig.1, you should make a better explanation for this. (4) You made a good literature review at the beginning of this paper, however, you didn’t made any comparison between your results and the literatures. (5) Validation should be made for the *** analysis method you used. -Reviewer 2 (Reject) - This paper researched on the *** analysis for obtaining the ***, and the trend of the *** was investigated by changing the *** and the ***. The *** is more convenient compared with the ***. As author mentioned, many researchers study on numerical models of ***. Some comments follow: 1. “Introduction, Literature review” are too long, and it should be concise as a research paper 2. In third section, the establishment process and most equations are same/similar with your accepted paper “***". 3. The Eq.3 is same Eq.2, The Eq.15 is same Eq4, and the Table 3 is insignificant. How did you obtained the Eq.17? 4. In forth section, authors should analyze the reasons of the changing trend of *** and the different with ***. 5. In Fig.2,3,4,5,6, just only heat source profile f(ζ) is analyzed by changing *** and the ***, how about the temperature field T(x,z)? Please give the values of parameters: ae, vw. 6. Author should perform some experiment to verify and analysis your model for meeting the level of this Journal. 第二个审稿人的第二条意见认为，文章里面用到的求profile的公式与我之前已经被录用的一篇文章很相似。事实上求解方法确实很相似（当然不是抄袭，公式也不是完全相同），现在这篇论文与已被录用论文用到的求解方法都不是本人原创，都是采用已被发表的方法，我也已经引用了该方法的来源文献。该方法相当于是计算工具，我的这篇论文采用与已被录用论文同样的计算方法，来研究不同的问题。 请问各位虫友，该如何回复第二个审稿人的第二条意见？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有5人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有17人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有15人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有5人回复
-
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有10人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有16人回复
-
93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有26人回复
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2017-05-15 18:41:27
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.5小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2017-05-15 23:56:50
40