24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1702  |  回复: 5

smallbug2000

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 小修论文还需要加比较实验吗?已有2人参与

投稿到一个低因子计算机方面的SCI期刊,投稿类型为letter,历时一年审稿结果为minor revision。审稿意见如下,一个审稿人,整体评价说如果加入最新论文比较可能更好。但是在修改意见并未提到。请教下:这种情况是否要加入比较实验?谢谢啦!
Reviewer #1: The paper brings a 3D pose tracking solution based on estimation of the 3D appearance models eliminating the need for hand-estimated models.
The manuscript is well organized and presents good English quality. Also, the overall presentation is good (formatting, pictures, pseudo-algorithms).
Authors present a strong motivation and state-of-the-art revision. In the following, a technical description of the solution is presented. It sounds clear and adequate for replication.
The paper is dense and longer discussion - specially Section 2 - would be desirable. However, this is understandable in the case of a letter paper.
Qualitative and quantitative results are presented and compared against related works. The results are promising and, for most scenarios, outperform the related works. Comparing against more recent solutions (2012 or later) would increase the paper impact.
Summarizing, the paper is well presented and brings strong content. In my opinion, it is worth for publication as a letter paper.

Minor:
Avoid imprecise statements such as: "Pick a modest value for λ, say λ= 0:001;"
What "statistical results" mean in: "Statistical results show that our proposed..."? Is it an average over all experiments?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

boy1234

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
smallbug2000: 金币+8, ★★★很有帮助 2017-05-11 10:11:19
安全起见建议适当增加,否则若编辑觉得不满意再送审就得不偿失了。
2楼2017-05-11 09:57:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

smallbug2000

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by boy1234 at 2017-05-11 09:57:24
安全起见建议适当增加,否则若编辑觉得不满意再送审就得不偿失了。

谢谢!
3楼2017-05-11 10:11:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

smallbug2000

木虫 (著名写手)

自己顶下!
4楼2017-05-11 15:51:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
smallbug2000: 金币+12, ★★★★★最佳答案 2017-05-11 16:44:06
审稿意见不管在何处,只要是在回复邮件里都要重视
不是哥不笑,一笑粉就掉
5楼2017-05-11 16:00:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

叶回

金虫 (正式写手)

不管大修小修,只要是comments,都要认真的对待,力求满足。

话说回来,楼主投的哪个期刊的letters呢
6楼2017-05-11 20:38:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 smallbug2000 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见