24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者小强博士将赠送您 50 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

小强博士

新虫 (著名写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 7048.6
散金: 1186
红花: 2
帖子: 2254
在线: 133.7小时
虫号: 5348800
注册: 2016-12-13
性别: GG
专业: 决策理论与方法

[求助] 关于投稿已有2人参与

头一天投稿，第二天主编就提了7条意见让大修，主编本人也做过相关领领域的研究，还让对比参考他的一篇文章！下面是给的意见，求助各位有经验的虫子，这篇文章还有戏吗？
I looked into your paper and decided to ask you for several amendments before sending it to full review.
1.You describe the first step of QFD as constructing the house of quality where in fact, the HOQ is one of the 7 QFD tools but not the first.
Presenting QFD as a process of using 4 matrices is also a limitation of the original approach.
Check this https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html or https://asq.org/learn-about-qual ... rview/overview.html as readily available descriptions but find an academic source that describe QFD properly and not as in many of the derived papers that carry the error endlessly.
2.Are you familiar with Reich, Y., & Levy, E. (2004). Managing product design quality under resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research, 42(13), 2555-2572?
It proposes a different way to prioritize EC to maximize the quality of the product. Does it have any relation to your approach? Can your approach lead to maximizing the quality of the product? How?
3.Franceschini (2015) should be Franceschini et al. (2015)
4.Your analysis of the consistency with only l, j, and k ignores significant information about them that comes from their relative position with other CRs. It might be only chance that you got the results as you did in this case study. Is there another way to test it? Is there a "correct" ordering?
5.Using this example to state that your approach "has an obvious advantage" is not supported. Can you provide better empirical evidence? For example, can you create 3-5 other cases and present how you generated them and test again?
6.Computational complexity is usually determined based on the dependence of the number of computational steps with respect to n – number of characteristic parameters; here it could be number of CR or number of respondents or both. Merely stating the number of steps on one problem is irrelevant. Can you offer another way to support this claim? This could also be resolved analytically by showing the details of the algorithm and going through it carefully. It could also be addressed empirically.
7.Since executing the algorithm takes fraction of a second, what is the relevance of efficiency? How many CRs are you expecting to have in a large problem? What is the largest that you encountered ever? It is better to provide data and merely state some concussions that have no practical value.

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼