| 查看: 1140 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者wisdri_xxp将赠送您 20 个金币 | |||
wisdri_xxp新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
有遇到这种情况的吗? 已有1人参与
|
||
|
上半年投了一篇IEEE 汇刊,修改了1次,主编给了Accept With Minor Changes, 且在决议信里写明 *** has gone through the IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics review process and publication is recommended for acceptance IF some minor revisions are made. The paper will not be sent out again to the reviewers - the AE and I will make sure the changes have been made, and return a final decision. 按照审稿意见修改后提交,AE又送了外审,请问哪位虫友遇到过这种情况,谢谢! |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
面上没中,邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有7人回复
哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生
已经有3人回复
找导师
已经有8人回复
国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上)
已经有13人回复
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
学科评审组评审是指会评吗?
已经有5人回复
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
| 祝福 |
2楼2016-12-23 15:14:30
【答案】应助回帖
|
帮你问了意得辑国外的专家,他们说这种情况还并不是罕见的,AE有时候对稿件是否接受也不是完全确定。AE为了避免不公平也不想直接就把楼主拒了就把稿件又拿去二审了。小修一般来说都不会有二审,但是这个“一般来说”还是不“一般来说”可能就看AE的心情了。 意得辑专家回信原文:This was possibly because even after the revisions were made, the AE was not very sure whether the manuscript was suitable for publication. However, he/she did not want to reject it immediately and decided to send it for another round of review just to ensure that the paper gets a fair chance at publication. Generally, manuscripts with minor revisions are not sent for another round of review. However, the final call lies with the AE, and if he/she can send it for review once again if he/she feels the need to. |
3楼2016-12-27 17:19:12










回复此楼