24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

闻道

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 2077.8
散金: 1705
红花: 15
帖子: 999
在线: 756.5小时
虫号: 1222180
注册: 2011-03-05
专业: 人工智能与知识工程

[求助] 这段审稿意见怎么理解呢

"Therefore, it is natural to question how to analyze the relationship between ... and ... according to their properties"

is supposed to justify one of the two hierarchies introduced. But "to analyze the relationship between..." is precisely what needs to be justified as a natural research topic/question. It does not seem sufficient, at least to me, to say that "it is a natural question". The other hierarchy is introduced in an even more obscure way:

"To facilitate comparison, we identify another family of canonical languages called..."

So, exaggerating a bit, the reader is left with hierarchy#1 and hierarchy#2 (the former justified as self-evidently natural and interesting, the latter justified because it helps analyzing the former) and with this piece of information is supposed to embark in the following long, involved technical development.

这段话怎么理解呢，他是在教我怎么写吗？

回复此楼