| 查看: 527 | 回复: 2 | |||
闻道金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
这段审稿意见怎么理解呢
|
|
"Therefore, it is natural to question how to analyze the relationship between ... and ... according to their properties" is supposed to justify one of the two hierarchies introduced. But "to analyze the relationship between..." is precisely what needs to be justified as a natural research topic/question. It does not seem sufficient, at least to me, to say that "it is a natural question". The other hierarchy is introduced in an even more obscure way: "To facilitate comparison, we identify another family of canonical languages called..." So, exaggerating a bit, the reader is left with hierarchy#1 and hierarchy#2 (the former justified as self-evidently natural and interesting, the latter justified because it helps analyzing the former) and with this piece of information is supposed to embark in the following long, involved technical development. 这段话怎么理解呢，他是在教我怎么写吗？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有13人回复
 |
2楼2016-11-24 16:58:18
|
|
3楼2016-11-25 09:59:17
30