| 查看: 808 | 回复: 3 | ||||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者小果果199128将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[求助]
急需PRA回复修改意见的模板！！！ 已有2人参与
|
||||
|
毕业在即，文章还在修改中， 目前文章修改的已见雏形，现在急需回去修改意见的模板！！！ 忘大神助一臂之力 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
277求调剂 数一104分
已经有13人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
336求调剂，一志愿中科大
已经有6人回复
-
071000生物学，一志愿深圳大学296分，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿北京化工085600 310分求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
274求调剂求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
277工科求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
283分求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有16人回复
4楼2016-10-04 09:15:06
shaojim106
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 148.5
- 散金: 3
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 45
- 在线: 38.5小时
- 虫号: 1112224
- 注册: 2010-10-01
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
2楼2016-10-02 21:28:06
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2016-10-03 06:50:32
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2016-10-03 06:50:32
|
审稿意见回复可参考以下模板： Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer’s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× ...... 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用： We are very sorry for our negligence of ……... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that…… We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that…… Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have …… 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见： Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: ×××××× Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………” 2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ×××××× We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. https://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=10272829 |
3楼2016-10-02 21:47:15
