| ²é¿´: 806 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷ÕßС¹û¹û199128½«ÔùËÍÄú 5 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||||
С¹û¹û199128гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
¼±ÐèPRA»Ø¸´ÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûµÄÄ£°å£¡£¡£¡ ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
|||
|
±ÏÒµÔÚ¼´£¬ÎÄÕ»¹ÔÚÐÞ¸ÄÖУ¬ ĿǰÎÄÕÂÐ޸ĵÄÒѼû³ûÐΣ¬ÏÖÔÚ¼±Ðè»ØÈ¥ÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûµÄÄ£°å£¡£¡£¡ Íü´óÉñÖúÒ»±ÛÖ®Á¦ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏר˶283Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
£¨µ÷¼Á£©Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±¨¿¼¹þ¶û±õ¹¤Òµ´óѧ0857×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³×¨Òµ378·Ö¿¼Éú
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
±¾¿Æ211£¬293·ÖÇëÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
315Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
302·Ö 085601Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸9²ÄÁÏѧ˶297ÒѹýÁù¼¶Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
shaojim106
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 148.5
- É¢½ð: 3
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 45
- ÔÚÏß: 38.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1112224
- ×¢²á: 2010-10-01
- רҵ: Ô×ӺͷÖ×ÓÎïÀí
2Â¥2016-10-02 21:28:06
paperhunter
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
»¹Ã»ÏëºÃ
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +14 - SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 14603 (½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 11.659
- ½ð±Ò: 345467
- É¢½ð: 9262
- ºì»¨: 1423
- ɳ·¢: 2016
- Ìû×Ó: 127554
- ÔÚÏß: 8880.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 971012
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-14
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
liouzhan654: ½ð±Ò+2, ¸Ðл½»Á÷ 2016-10-03 06:50:32
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
liouzhan654: ½ð±Ò+2, ¸Ðл½»Á÷ 2016-10-03 06:50:32
|
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´¿É²Î¿¼ÒÔÏÂÄ£°å£º Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers¡¯ comments concerning our manuscript entitled ¡°Paper Title¡± (ID: ÎÄÕ¸åºÅ). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á 2. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á ...... ÖðÌõÒâ¼û»Ø´ð£¬ÇмÉÒ»¶¨²»ÄÜÓÐÒÅ© Õë¶Ô²»Í¬µÄÎÊÌâÓÐÏÂÁм¸¸öÀñòÊõÓï¿ÉÊʵ±ÓÃÓ㺠We are very sorry for our negligence of ¡¡... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ¡¡... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that¡¡ We have made correction according to the Reviewer¡¯s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that¡¡ Considering the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion, we have ¡¡ ×îºóÌØÒâ¸ÐлһÏÂÕâ¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£º Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: ͬÉÏÊö Reviewer #3: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of ¡°¡¡¡± were corrected as ¡°¡¡¡¡¡± 2. Line 107, ¡°¡¡¡± was added 3. Line 129, ¡°¡¡¡± was deleted ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers¡¯ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. https://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=10272829 |

3Â¥2016-10-02 21:47:15
С¹û¹û199128
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 198.2
- É¢½ð: 15
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 191
- ÔÚÏß: 51.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2977333
- ×¢²á: 2014-02-19
- רҵ: Ô×ӺͷÖ×ÓÎïÀí
4Â¥2016-10-04 09:15:06














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥