24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者996748059将赠送您 9 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

996748059

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 1848.2
散金: 359
红花: 1
帖子: 962
在线: 408.7小时
虫号: 2630883
注册: 2013-09-02
专业: 区域可持续发展

[求助] SSCI 投稿 with editor 18天？已有1人参与

投稿ssci with editor 一周后催稿编辑回复文章她看过了并且给了很多意见包括参考文献但是据稿了。
花了一个月按照编辑的意见进行了修改，以后重新投稿，已经with editor 18天请问会不会初审再被拒，因为第一次编辑没说据稿重投。
自己修改重投的，请大神帮忙看看，这种情况with editor 18天了还会送什么现在不敢再问编辑了，因为第一次问了被拒。。。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一已经有8人回复
博士读完未来一定会好吗已经有23人回复
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗已经有11人回复
读博已经有4人回复
JMPT 期刊投稿流程已经有4人回复
心脉受损已经有5人回复
Springer期刊投稿求助已经有4人回复
小论文投稿已经有3人回复
申请2026年博士已经有6人回复

1楼2016-09-17 21:36:04

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

996748059

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 1848.2
散金: 359
红花: 1
帖子: 962
在线: 408.7小时
虫号: 2630883
注册: 2013-09-02
专业: 区域可持续发展

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2016-09-17 22:41:38
拒稿理由是什么？如果是稿件量太大，与期刊专业方向不符，或者没有足够新意，重投后可能仍然会通不过初审。

I am writing to let you know that I have read your paper and decided against sending it for review. While there is interest in the writing of dissertation abstracts across different disciplines, I am afraid that the study described in the paper is not up to the standard that we require for publication in ESP. In my opinion the paper gives far too little information on how the analysis was done; what the research corpus characteristics are (other than land science dissertation abstracts written by students receiving PhDs in the US and in China); or what measures were taken to ensure reliability and validity of the results. There is no synthesis of the results that allows readers to understand what exactly was found. The paper also is not situated within the ongoing discussions in the field of doctoral student writing. In fact, there are no references to some of the very important work in Applied Linguistics, which is central to the research story of dissertation abstract
writing. For instance, there is no mention of the work of Swales or Hyland, two key figures in the field. Instead the research relies on less known publications, which are likely unfamiliar to our international readers. In light of these concerns, I am not able to consider your work for publication in English for Specific Purposes.

I would, however, encourage you to become more familiar with the work in the field. A good start would be to review the papers published in English for Specific Purposes, the Journal of Second Language Writing and the Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Another useful reference would be Swales seminal book, Genre Analysis.
给了这么多意见大概7天是编辑给的意见没有外审花了一个月按照她的意见修改了