24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者huazaisss将赠送您 50 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

huazaisss

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 157.6
散金: 1660
红花: 4
帖子: 476
在线: 54.9小时
虫号: 2621277
注册: 2013-08-28
专业: 光子与光电子器件

[求助] 求助各位：大修，审稿人让补充实验，补充不了会被拒吗？已有2人参与

一个审稿人是小修后发表，这个让补充实验，如下，如果我补充不了，拒稿概率多大啊，请教各位前辈！！！
Reviewer #1 (Technical Comments to the Author):

This manuscript proposed a design of graphene-ring resonator system, which can serve as a tunable optical analog to electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). The relationship between the EIT-like effect and the Fermi level, the bias voltages were investigated. However, it seems still too premature to publish the present manuscript. More experiments are needed to improve the manuscript.

Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author):

The following points need to be considered:
1) Graphene films serve as important components in as-designed devices. However, there are very few characterizations on graphene samples themselves besides one Raman spectrum. The authors are suggested to add more characterizations on as-used graphene samples. For examples, the thicknesses/layer numbers, crystallinity, grain sizes, etc.
2) Will the layer numbers of graphene affect the performance of the devices? The authors are suggested to carry out more experiments to clarify this concern. That is, devices with different graphene layers should be assembled and evaluated.
3) The denotations should be kept consistent in the whole manuscript to avoid confusions. For example, in Page 4, “tg” was used to denote the thickness of the Al2O3 between the two graphene layers. However, in Page 5, the same “tg” was used to denote the thickness of graphene layer.
4) The authors should improve the figure captions to make them more self-evident. For example, there are no any texts to explain the inset of Fig. 1e.

回复此楼