24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2026级博士研究生招生报考通知(长期有效)
查看: 3502  |  回复: 7
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者huazaisss将赠送您 50 个金币

huazaisss

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 求助各位:大修,审稿人让补充实验,补充不了会被拒吗?已有2人参与

一个审稿人是小修后发表,这个让补充实验,如下,如果我补充不了,拒稿概率多大啊,请教各位前辈!!!
Reviewer #1 (Technical Comments to the Author):

This manuscript proposed a design of graphene-ring resonator system, which can serve as a tunable optical analog to electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). The relationship between the EIT-like effect and the Fermi level, the bias voltages were investigated. However, it seems still too premature to publish the present manuscript. More experiments are needed to improve the manuscript.

Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author):

The following points need to be considered:
1) Graphene films serve as important components in as-designed devices. However, there are very few characterizations on graphene samples themselves besides one Raman spectrum. The authors are suggested to add more characterizations on as-used graphene samples. For examples, the thicknesses/layer numbers, crystallinity, grain sizes, etc.
2) Will the layer numbers of graphene affect the performance of the devices? The authors are suggested to carry out more experiments to clarify this concern. That is, devices with different graphene layers should be assembled and evaluated.
3) The denotations should be kept consistent in the whole manuscript to avoid confusions. For example, in Page 4, “tg” was used to denote the thickness of the Al2O3 between the two graphene layers. However, in Page 5, the same “tg” was used to denote the thickness of graphene layer.
4) The authors should improve the figure captions to make them more self-evident. For example, there are no any texts to explain the inset of Fig. 1e.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hqzhou0817

金虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
大致看了一下审稿意见,感觉补充实验也不难啊
海纳百川,有容乃大。壁立千仞,无欲则刚!
2楼2016-08-31 09:08:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huazaisss

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by hqzhou0817 at 2016-08-31 09:08:29
大致看了一下审稿意见,感觉补充实验也不难啊

石墨烯的表征从拉曼就可以看出来啊,而且我还有SEM的照片,我这个是大片的膜,不是碎状石墨烯,怎么看结晶啊
3楼2016-08-31 10:05:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huazaisss

金虫 (正式写手)

我才知道scientific report出事了,我这个就是这个,咋办啊,撤稿吗?
4楼2016-08-31 10:22:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huazaisss

金虫 (正式写手)

5楼2016-08-31 10:35:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
如果限于条件不能补充实验,可以直接说明情况,表示会在以后的研究中创造条件完成实验。如果有条件做但不想做,就要说明不需要补充实验的原因,最好能够找到权威文献支持自己的观点,或者类似的实验数据。
咱也是有组织的人了...
6楼2016-08-31 23:33:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

皖湘爱由心生

新虫 (正式写手)

7楼2016-09-01 00:07:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

08wutianli

木虫 (正式写手)

那就好好补,补了才有希望,加油!

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2016-09-01 07:59:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 huazaisss 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见