24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

qiang_1992

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 6655.5
帖子: 770
在线: 594.7小时
虫号: 2155235

[交流] 审稿意见回来，ASCE期刊，大家帮忙看看是否可申请重投机会，谢谢了

投稿ASCE，审稿意见大致如下，最后编辑给了拒稿，求助是否可申请重投机会，谢谢啦

Reviewer #1: This manuscript describes research on****. I need to say that the manuscript is really hard to read. Thus, I had quite often a hard time to capture the meaning of many phrases. Just because of inappropriate language I cannot recommend the manuscript for publication. ***十多条意见，包括修改语句，解释现象和结论，并让加一些东西。
Reviewer #2: This manuscript presents a relatively new structural solution applicable to ****. A ** approach was assumed to investigate the ****. In general, the idea behind this work is sound and the paper provides a preliminary insight on a practically interesting problem. In some cases the submission lacks in terms of presented data/information and the exposition of the research is weakened by that. As such, the authors are encouraged to address the following points, which will hopefully increase the quality of the manuscript even further (not in the order of importance):***十多条意见，让引用几篇文献，解释数值模型和更正语句错误
Reviewer #3: The technical content of this paper may be great, but the grammar needs improvement. It is hard to understand and is very awkward. There are passages that I read several times and was unable to determine the meaning. I think it should be reviewed by an editor if the authors are not able to correct the grammar. 没有审稿意见

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2016-08-24 14:34:45

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

xoameik

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 586.7
帖子: 600
在线: 69.8小时
虫号: 4455991

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

26楼: Originally posted by qiang_1992 at 2016-08-24 16:33:49
难以理解这种审稿意见是不是特别负面
...

我是觉得重投不太好，如果再分配到这个编辑，如果你修改不大很难让编辑给你大修或者小修。建议润色一下，可以尝试AJE，我用过多次，感觉很好，用完以后语言和逻辑结构都有很大提升空间，去看看价格 https://www.aje.com/c/Caochen 性价比蛮高。另外，还是建议你不要重投了，换一家，不过语言还是需加工！