±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 288  |  »Ø¸´: 0

ning888

½ð³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)

[ÇóÖú] °ïæ¿´Ò»ÏÂÉó¸åÒâ¼û

The problem is not the residual electron density around the heavy metal atoms (a usual occurrence) but unusual and physically meaningless areas of negative (!) electron density (red contours in figure 1.png). One thing certain about electron density is that it is a non-negative function at any point. At last, I found the reason: in each case, the data contains a few dozens of reflections with near-zero intensity, while it should be quite strong. Clearly, these were obscured by something. Excluding these reflections (26, 56, 42 and 31, respectively for 1-4) reduced R1 spectacularly, from 4.06% to 3.30% for 1, 5.1% to 2.64% for 2, 5.09% to 3.08% for 3 and 3.74% to 2.81% for 4, and makes the residual map much tidier. The new RES files are attached, I recommend the authors to use these for final refinement and re-submit the CIF files. I also removed the unnecessary restraints on the MeCN molecule and introduced RIGU command instead. I do not know why the latter did not work for the authors, but I had no problems at all.  Normally, excluding such large numbers of reflections is not recommended, because it can seriously affect the statistics. In the present case, I made various statistical checks upon the data and reckon it acceptable.
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ÎÒ»áÏòòßòÑÒ»Ñù£¬ÈÃ×Ô¼ºÔÚ֪ʶµÄº£ÑóÀï×ÔÓÉ·ÉÏè¡£òßòѵãË®£¬¼¯¸÷¼ÒÖ®³¤¡£
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ ning888 µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 334·Ö Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÎäÀí ²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á +5 ÀîÀî²»·þÊä 2026-03-26 5/250 2026-03-29 13:40 by ÌÆãå¶ù
[¿¼ÑÐ] 291Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Y-cap 2026-03-29 6/300 2026-03-29 13:18 by mumin1990
[¿¼ÑÐ] 070300»¯Ñ§354Çóµ÷¼Á +6 101´ÎÏ£Íû 2026-03-28 6/300 2026-03-29 12:57 by Î޼ʵIJÝÔ­
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703 »¯Ñ§ Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸É½¶«´óѧ 342 ·Ö +4 Shern¡ª- 2026-03-28 4/200 2026-03-29 00:47 by 544594351
[¿¼ÑÐ] 22408 359·Öµ÷¼Á +4 Qshers 2026-03-27 5/250 2026-03-28 21:26 by zhq0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] ʳƷ¹¤³Ìר˶һ־ԸÖк£Ñó309Çóµ÷¼Á +4 СÕÅzxyÕÅ 2026-03-26 8/400 2026-03-28 19:25 by lbsjt
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600 286·Ö ²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á +7 ÂéÀ±öÏÓã 2026-03-27 8/400 2026-03-28 12:17 by zllcz
[¿¼ÑÐ] 081200-314 +3 LILIQQ 2026-03-27 4/200 2026-03-28 09:41 by ±£»¤µØÇòÄãÎÒ×öÆ
[¿¼²©] 26É격 +3 ¼ÓÓͳ尡£¡ 2026-03-26 3/150 2026-03-27 15:38 by cls512
[¿¼ÑÐ] 279 ·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ˯¸öºÃ¾õ_16 2026-03-24 4/200 2026-03-27 15:05 by ×íÔÚ·çÀï
[¿¼ÑÐ] 308Çóµ÷¼Á +7 īīĮ 2026-03-25 7/350 2026-03-27 14:47 by ¿ñìÅÂóµ±µ±
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Àí¹¤´óѧ081700£¬³õÊÔ·ÖÊý271 +6 kotoko_ik 2026-03-23 7/350 2026-03-27 12:29 by »ÝÖÝÅíÓÚêÌ
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology +3 Russ_ss 2026-03-25 5/250 2026-03-27 10:49 by ½С¹û»­´ó±ý
[¿¼ÑÐ] 325Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Àî¼Îͼ¡¤S¡¤Â· 2026-03-23 5/250 2026-03-27 00:42 by wxiongid
[¿¼ÑÐ] 281Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÑÇ¿ËÎ÷good 2026-03-26 5/250 2026-03-26 19:48 by ²»³Ôô~µÄ؈
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì 317Çóµ÷¼Á +4 JKSOIID 2026-03-26 4/200 2026-03-26 15:58 by ²»³Ôô~µÄ؈
[¿¼ÑÐ] 334·Ö Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÎäÀí-080500 ²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á +4 ÀîÀî²»·þÊä 2026-03-25 4/200 2026-03-25 21:26 by ÐÇ¿ÕÐÇÔÂ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 282Çóµ÷¼Á +3 wcq131415 2026-03-24 3/150 2026-03-25 12:16 by userper
[¿¼ÑÐ] »¯¹¤×¨Ë¶Çóµ÷¼Á +3 questionÍì·ç 2026-03-24 3/150 2026-03-24 18:48 by jhhcooi
[¿¼ÑÐ] ʯºÓ×Ó´óѧ£¨211¡¢Ë«Ò»Á÷£©Ë¶²©Ñо¿Éú³¤ÆÚÕÐÉú¹«¸æ +3 Àî×ÓÄ¿ 2026-03-22 3/150 2026-03-22 21:01 by ÔõôÊÍ»³
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û