| 查看: 273 | 回复: 0 | |||
ning888金虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
帮忙看一下审稿意见
|
| The problem is not the residual electron density around the heavy metal atoms (a usual occurrence) but unusual and physically meaningless areas of negative (!) electron density (red contours in figure 1.png). One thing certain about electron density is that it is a non-negative function at any point. At last, I found the reason: in each case, the data contains a few dozens of reflections with near-zero intensity, while it should be quite strong. Clearly, these were obscured by something. Excluding these reflections (26, 56, 42 and 31, respectively for 1-4) reduced R1 spectacularly, from 4.06% to 3.30% for 1, 5.1% to 2.64% for 2, 5.09% to 3.08% for 3 and 3.74% to 2.81% for 4, and makes the residual map much tidier. The new RES files are attached, I recommend the authors to use these for final refinement and re-submit the CIF files. I also removed the unnecessary restraints on the MeCN molecule and introduced RIGU command instead. I do not know why the latter did not work for the authors, but I had no problems at all. Normally, excluding such large numbers of reflections is not recommended, because it can seriously affect the statistics. In the present case, I made various statistical checks upon the data and reckon it acceptable. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中南大学易小艺课题组诚招2026申请-考核制博士生
已经有0人回复
-
海南师范大学招收化学博士（光电功能材料课题组招收博士研究生）
已经有10人回复
-
无机化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有227人回复
-
求助几个团簇的cif
已经有0人回复
-
急求该反应的详细机理
已经有4人回复
-
【Ei | Scopus 双检索】2026年智能交通与未来出行国际会议（CSTFM 2026）
已经有0人回复
-
【EI|Scopus 双检索】2026年第六届机器人与人工智能国际会议（JCRAI 2026）
已经有0人回复
