| 查看: 445 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者tiancai203将赠送您 20 个金币 | |||
tiancai203新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
关于一条comment的意思
|
||
|
请大家帮帮忙，以下comment实在不明白什么意思，十分感谢！！ I can understand there could be no justification, but at least I would have expected a reference to another similar work… BTW, in section 4 (Pag. 9), there is a sentence that seems to give a sort of justification, even if related to the numerical simulations rather than to the model validation: “If not other specified, the calculations will be performed at the fixed streamwise wave number α = 0.35, which corresponds to the maximum amplitude of two-dimensional waves, as shown in Fig 4.”. Maybe in this point it would be more correct to refer to Fig. 4, or even remove the sentence that refers to the value 0.35, otherwise it looks as a sort of “magical number”… Please explain. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有5人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有28人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有8人回复