| 查看: 464 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者tiancai203将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
tiancai203新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
关于一条comment的意思
|
|
|
请大家帮帮忙，以下comment实在不明白什么意思，十分感谢！！ I can understand there could be no justification, but at least I would have expected a reference to another similar work… BTW, in section 4 (Pag. 9), there is a sentence that seems to give a sort of justification, even if related to the numerical simulations rather than to the model validation: “If not other specified, the calculations will be performed at the fixed streamwise wave number α = 0.35, which corresponds to the maximum amplitude of two-dimensional waves, as shown in Fig 4.”. Maybe in this point it would be more correct to refer to Fig. 4, or even remove the sentence that refers to the value 0.35, otherwise it looks as a sort of “magical number”… Please explain. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2026年面上项目中了，2A+B, 会评顺利通过
已经有12人回复
-
Suzuki偶联中硼酸酯原料掉下的硼酸酯是否可以自身偶联，生成B2Pin2杂质
已经有3人回复
-
大龄残疾硕士的一点执念
已经有19人回复
-
今年E04面上
已经有19人回复
-
刑法学论文投稿求助
已经有5人回复
-
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
已经有3人回复
-
最后一年，祈求好运
已经有3人回复
-
风电环氧领域
已经有3人回复