| 查看: 492 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者tiancai203将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
tiancai203新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
关于一条comment的意思
|
|
|
请大家帮帮忙，以下comment实在不明白什么意思，十分感谢！！ I can understand there could be no justification, but at least I would have expected a reference to another similar work… BTW, in section 4 (Pag. 9), there is a sentence that seems to give a sort of justification, even if related to the numerical simulations rather than to the model validation: “If not other specified, the calculations will be performed at the fixed streamwise wave number α = 0.35, which corresponds to the maximum amplitude of two-dimensional waves, as shown in Fig 4.”. Maybe in this point it would be more correct to refer to Fig. 4, or even remove the sentence that refers to the value 0.35, otherwise it looks as a sort of “magical number”… Please explain. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有19人回复
-
关于核磁制样
已经有3人回复
-
郑州大学申博
已经有6人回复
-
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现，多家期刊声明抵制
已经有5人回复
-
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有12人回复