| 查看: 486 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者tiancai203将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
tiancai203新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
关于一条comment的意思
|
|
|
请大家帮帮忙，以下comment实在不明白什么意思，十分感谢！！ I can understand there could be no justification, but at least I would have expected a reference to another similar work… BTW, in section 4 (Pag. 9), there is a sentence that seems to give a sort of justification, even if related to the numerical simulations rather than to the model validation: “If not other specified, the calculations will be performed at the fixed streamwise wave number α = 0.35, which corresponds to the maximum amplitude of two-dimensional waves, as shown in Fig 4.”. Maybe in this point it would be more correct to refer to Fig. 4, or even remove the sentence that refers to the value 0.35, otherwise it looks as a sort of “magical number”… Please explain. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
