24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1050  |  回复: 6
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者wyjjf将赠送您 89 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wyjjf

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 怎么对付两个审稿人?其中一个严重否定 已有2人参与

We now have referees' comments on the above paper.  I am pleased to tell you that the work is of interest, but regret to say that the paper is not considered suitable in its present form for publication in S*** T**** R****.  The reasons are detailed in the comments below.      

You will see that a number of general and specific points are mentioned which necessitate extensive rewriting of the paper.      

【这个不咋懂】 ????? ??????????
Please consider how you wish to proceed. If you are able to revise the paper extensively, to deal in full with all the points mentioned, we shall be willing to consider the position further.   

If you do decide to submit a revised version of the paper, go to https://********


Comments from the Editors and Reviewers:
【第一个审稿人好像完全否定了吧,该怎么说服他???????????????】
Reviewer #1: The paper considers the * * * *, possibly with consideration of ****.
While I can understand the interest in such analyses in rare cases the problem can be solved with standard commercial software and does not fit the high standards of a research journal such as S**** T**** R****.

【第2个审稿人好像问题不大了吧???????????????】
Reviewer #2: Please elaborate on the points raised by the manuscript rating questions and any further commments that the author/s need to address in this box.
1.        This article documents h**** a**** of ***** ***** of * ***** *****.【和我原文题目不同,就是修改成这个目??????????????????????】
2.        At some places, the spelling and punctuation are incorrect. For example, generally delete the comma after the word "that" (e.g., page2, line30) and "which" (e.g., page 7, line 60), and do you mean "bridge" when you write "breach" (page 15, line 44; page 17, line 40). Run a spell and grammar check.
3.        Define all abbreviations, such as *** and SPH.
4.        Follow accepted convention when citing and listing references, e.g., last name, first name initials, title, where published, year, and page numbers. (Put a period after "al"
5.        On page 5, line27, the word "Method" is more appropriate than the word "Methodology." (Methodology means the study of methods.)
6.        Page 6, line 46: insert the word "is" after the word "tank."
7.        Page 9, line 52: define flow coefficient, explain how to obtain its value, and discuss its influence.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主需要用事实说话,找几篇情况差不多的文献,证明自己所做的研究成果足以在所投期刊发表。此外,责编也比较认可楼主的文章,回答要言之有据,令人信服,修改到位,文章被接收的希望还是很大的。
咱也是有组织的人了...
3楼2016-06-29 23:06:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答

crazydr

新虫 (文坛精英)

用实例说服他,用相关的参考文献等等应该都可以的

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2016-06-29 22:55:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

a84361345

新虫 (小有名气)

我的审稿意见跟你相似度极高  且编辑的回复基本一模一样   我的已经接受了   加油好好改   你这篇文章希望很大

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2016-06-30 00:37:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
6楼2016-06-30 02:14:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见