| ²é¿´: 502 | »Ø¸´: 2 | ||
Ê«Ïæ×Óľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
Æ´ÃüÈýÄï
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÂÛÎÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÖйØÓÚCVs±íÃæ¿ØÖƹý³ÌµÄÎÊÌâÇóÖú ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
ÂÛÎÄÖÐÓÐÒ»¶Î¹ØÓÚCVsµÄÃèÊö£º ÔÚɨËÙΪ20 mV s-1ʱ£¬Ñõ»¯»¹Ô·åµçλ²î60 mV£¬±íÃæ·´Ó¦Îª¿ìËٵĵç×Ó×ªÒÆ¹ý³Ì¡£É¨ËÙ20 mV s-1µ½200 mV s-1Ôö¼Ó£¬Ñõ»¯·åµçÁ÷ºÍ»¹Ô·åµçÁ÷¾ùÓëɨËÙ³ÊÏßÐÔÔö¼Ó£¬±íÃ÷surface-controlled electrochemical process¡£ ½á¹ûÉó¸åÒâ¼ûΪ£º First of all, a theoritical peak separation of 0mV is expected for a fast and reversible surface-confined process (see Bard and Faulkner). A peak separation of 60 mV would suggest a diffusion controlled process. However, a linear current dependance towards scan rate is indicative of a surface -controlled process. A peak-to-peak separation of 60 mV for a surface-confined process is high as compared to the theoretical 0 mV. The electron transfer can therefore not be considered as "rapid and reversible". Could the authors modify the discussion? ÈçºÎÐ޸ģ¬Çë´Í½Ì£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ºÏ·Ê¹¤Òµ´óѧ854ÒÇÆ÷¼¼Êõ×ÛºÏרҵ¿Î¿¼ÑÐ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
27Äêµç»¯Ñ§²©Ê¿±ÏÒµ£¬ÏëÕÒº£ÍâQSǰ50µÄ¸ßУ¶Á²©ºóÇóÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ86È˻ظ´
27Äêµç³Ø/²ÄÁÏÀ಩ʿÉêÇë
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
2027Ä격ʿÉêÇë»òת²©¿ÆÑÐÖúÀí ÇóÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊËÓÐ2025×îÐÂÓ°ÏìÒò×ÓExcel±í£¿½ð±ÒÇóÖú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ53È˻ظ´
ÂÈ»¯ÄÆÓëÓлú»ÇËá·ÖÀë
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
Èðµä-²©ºó-¹Ì̬µç³Ø-Õ³½á¼Á-ï®Àë×Óµç³Ø·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ53È˻ظ´
¹ã¶«Ê¡ÃæÉÏÓÐʲô¶¯Ì¬Ã´£¬É¶Ê±ºò¹«²¼Ñ½£¿
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´

truemoon
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 82 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 6553.2
- É¢½ð: 30
- ºì»¨: 14
- Ìû×Ó: 563
- ÔÚÏß: 314.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 504132
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-15
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§·ÖÎö
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
| ÕÒÕâÆªÎÄÏ׿´¿´48 E. Laviron, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1979, 100, 263-270.£¬ÀïÃæ¾ÍÊǽ²µÄ±íÃæ¿ØÖÆÊÇÈçºÎ¶¨ÒåµÄ£¬ÎÒµ±Ê±Ò²Åöµ½ÀàËÆµÄÎÊÌ⣬ÎÒ¾õµÃÄã½âÊÍÇå³þ¾ÍÐÐÁË£¬ÉÔ΢ƫÀëµãËûµÄÎÊÌâÒ²¾Í¹ýÈ¥ÁË¡£ |

2Â¥2016-06-14 09:50:41
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
3Â¥2016-06-14 12:35:08









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ͶƱ: