| 查看: 5590 | 回复: 60 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
小书园至尊木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
审稿意见2正1负，负的那个是否需要回复？ 已有25人参与
|
||
|
Reviewer #1: The design of XXX is very interesting and the study is comprehensive. The general topic of the current manuscript is of interest for readers of XXX（期刊名）. I would suggest the authors consider the follows carefully beore this manuscript might be accepted for publication. Reviewer #2: Although I think the results are correct, I cannot recommend its publication in XXX（期刊名） after considering following points: 1.Similar results in this paper have already been published in 某期刊 and in 某期刊 2.原理也不新 Reviewer #3: The manuscript presents some interesting simulation results on a design of XXX, in which different kinds of resonance modes can be obtained. The conclusion is well supported by the results. Therefore, I recommend for acceptance after the authors address the following comments. 审稿经历了2个阶段，1和2两个审稿人意见返回编辑部的时候，状态变成了reviews completed，又过了几天，reviews completed状态没变但是时间变了一次，后来知道应该是找了第三个审稿人裁判，最终结果是minor revision。 从语句中我感觉审稿人1和3应该是给的minor revision，审稿人2给的是reject。 请问下，在这种情况，审稿人2的意见我是否要回复？ |
回复此楼
ody2004
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
27楼2016-05-05 08:45:51
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345467
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127554
- 在线: 8880.4小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2016-05-04 15:08:47
张春刚
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 265 (大学生)
- 金币: 5736.8
- 散金: 295
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 1882
- 在线: 102.3小时
- 虫号: 4427064
- 注册: 2016-02-23
- 专业: 电力系统
3楼2016-05-04 15:14:13
marineman
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
爱八卦爱生活
- 应助: 486 (硕士)
- 金币: 26133.4
- 散金: 7934
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 7797
- 在线: 279.7小时
- 虫号: 255556
- 注册: 2006-05-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 等离子体物理
4楼2016-05-04 15:22:29
20