| 查看: 589 | 回复: 1 | |||
[求助]
请大家帮我看看这几个审稿人意见，在线急等 已有1人参与
|
|
1、In the inflection discussion, the authors may wish to add that the deviation for high-limit Arrhenius behavior denotes the "effective" rheological wax appearance temperature. 2、We feel that there could very well be subtle mass balance effects here where the silica is effectively sequestering the heavy polars from the bulk fluid (via adsorption), and reducing the nucleation effect of the polar components, while also simultaneously "covering up" themselves with heavy polars, negating the nucleation effects of the inherent SiO2. This could be a very interesting interplay, but the authors must in the final analysis decide how they wish to interpret the data. (Of course the opposite effect is paradoxically observed in the rheology..) 这两个问题我有点看不懂，请大家帮我看一下什么意思，该怎么回答？ 3、The crystallization process can be influenced by the particular choice of cooling rate (5°C/min). How sensitive to this choice were the reported WAT ́s? Moreover, the cooling rate for the microscopy experiments was also 5°C/min, however the rheological measurements were carried out at a cooling rate of 0.5 °C/min. Please clarify and justify the choice of cooling rate. 其实我也不知道为什么呀，因为我看大家的论文都是这么做的，但是我该怎么回复审稿人的问题呢？ 在线急等 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有74人回复
-
岩土工程学报什么时候才能终审完呐
已经有4人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有25人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有6人回复
-
快农历七夕节了，轻松一下，男人悄悄话，女施主请不要进来。
已经有3人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有9人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有26人回复
-
我的国基提前知道中了，可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了，怎么会有这样的人
已经有16人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有12人回复
cardinalree
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- PCEPI: 1
- 应助: 50 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.843
- 金币: 9872.2
- 散金: 4892
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 2295
- 在线: 382.3小时
- 虫号: 2769460
- 注册: 2013-11-01
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 资源化工
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
1、In the inflection discussion, the authors may wish to add that the deviation for high-limit Arrhenius behavior denotes the "effective" rheological wax appearance temperature. 在拐点分析中作者可能希望补充阿伦尼乌斯behavior的误差对流体态析蜡点的影响。 2、We feel that there could very well be subtle mass balance effects here where the silica is effectively sequestering the heavy polars from the bulk fluid (via adsorption), and reducing the nucleation effect of the polar components, while also simultaneously "covering up" themselves with heavy polars, negating the nucleation effects of the inherent SiO2. This could be a very interesting interplay, but the authors must in the final analysis decide how they wish to interpret the data. (Of course the opposite effect is paradoxically observed in the rheology..) 我们认为质量平衡的影响在本次试验中微乎其微，硅原子从体积流体中有效地隔离了重质极性物质，减小了极性组分成核效应，但是也用重组分的极性覆盖自身，忽略了二氧化硅本身的成核效应。这是一个非常有意思的相互影响作用，但是作者必须在最后的分析里决定如何解释这些数据。 见到英文文献就像翻译下，  |
2楼2016-04-28 15:43:11
25
