| 查看: 510 | 回复: 1 | |||
[求助]
请大家帮我看看这几个审稿人意见，在线急等 已有1人参与
|
|
1、In the inflection discussion, the authors may wish to add that the deviation for high-limit Arrhenius behavior denotes the "effective" rheological wax appearance temperature. 2、We feel that there could very well be subtle mass balance effects here where the silica is effectively sequestering the heavy polars from the bulk fluid (via adsorption), and reducing the nucleation effect of the polar components, while also simultaneously "covering up" themselves with heavy polars, negating the nucleation effects of the inherent SiO2. This could be a very interesting interplay, but the authors must in the final analysis decide how they wish to interpret the data. (Of course the opposite effect is paradoxically observed in the rheology..) 这两个问题我有点看不懂，请大家帮我看一下什么意思，该怎么回答？ 3、The crystallization process can be influenced by the particular choice of cooling rate (5°C/min). How sensitive to this choice were the reported WAT ́s? Moreover, the cooling rate for the microscopy experiments was also 5°C/min, however the rheological measurements were carried out at a cooling rate of 0.5 °C/min. Please clarify and justify the choice of cooling rate. 其实我也不知道为什么呀，因为我看大家的论文都是这么做的，但是我该怎么回复审稿人的问题呢？ 在线急等 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
不自信的我
已经有11人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有6人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有8人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
26申博（荧光探针方向，有机合成）
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有26人回复
-
2026年机械制造与材料应用国际会议 （ICMMMA 2026）
已经有4人回复
-
Cas 72-43-5需要30g，定制合成，能接单的留言
已经有8人回复
cardinalree
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- PCEPI: 1
- 应助: 50 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.843
- 金币: 9872.2
- 散金: 4892
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 2295
- 在线: 382.3小时
- 虫号: 2769460
- 注册: 2013-11-01
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 资源化工
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
1、In the inflection discussion, the authors may wish to add that the deviation for high-limit Arrhenius behavior denotes the "effective" rheological wax appearance temperature. 在拐点分析中作者可能希望补充阿伦尼乌斯behavior的误差对流体态析蜡点的影响。 2、We feel that there could very well be subtle mass balance effects here where the silica is effectively sequestering the heavy polars from the bulk fluid (via adsorption), and reducing the nucleation effect of the polar components, while also simultaneously "covering up" themselves with heavy polars, negating the nucleation effects of the inherent SiO2. This could be a very interesting interplay, but the authors must in the final analysis decide how they wish to interpret the data. (Of course the opposite effect is paradoxically observed in the rheology..) 我们认为质量平衡的影响在本次试验中微乎其微，硅原子从体积流体中有效地隔离了重质极性物质，减小了极性组分成核效应，但是也用重组分的极性覆盖自身，忽略了二氧化硅本身的成核效应。这是一个非常有意思的相互影响作用，但是作者必须在最后的分析里决定如何解释这些数据。 见到英文文献就像翻译下，  |
2楼2016-04-28 15:43:11