应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 化学化工区 » 石油化工 » 勘采储运 » 请大家帮我看看这几个审稿人意见，在线急等
21/1返回列表
查看: 560  |  回复: 1
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

Roger杰

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 请大家帮我看看这几个审稿人意见，在线急等 已有1人参与

1、In the inflection discussion, the authors may wish to add that the deviation for high-limit Arrhenius behavior denotes the "effective" rheological wax appearance temperature.

2、We feel that there could very well be subtle mass balance effects here where the silica is effectively sequestering the heavy polars from the bulk fluid (via adsorption), and reducing the nucleation effect of the polar components, while also simultaneously "covering up" themselves with heavy polars, negating the nucleation effects of the inherent SiO2. This could be a very interesting interplay, but the authors must in the final analysis decide how they wish to interpret the data. (Of course the opposite effect is paradoxically observed in the rheology..)
这两个问题我有点看不懂，请大家帮我看一下什么意思，该怎么回答？
3、The crystallization process can be influenced by the particular choice of cooling rate (5°C/min). How sensitive to this choice were the reported WAT ́s? Moreover, the cooling rate for the microscopy experiments was also 5°C/min, however the rheological measurements were carried out at a cooling rate of 0.5 °C/min. Please clarify and justify the choice of cooling rate.
其实我也不知道为什么呀，因为我看大家的论文都是这么做的，但是我该怎么回复审稿人的问题呢？
在线急等
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
1楼 2016-04-26 20:47:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cardinalree

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
1、In the inflection discussion, the authors may wish to add that the deviation for high-limit Arrhenius behavior denotes the "effective" rheological wax appearance temperature.
在拐点分析中作者可能希望补充阿伦尼乌斯behavior的误差对流体态析蜡点的影响。
2、We feel that there could very well be subtle mass balance effects here where the silica is effectively sequestering the heavy polars from the bulk fluid (via adsorption), and reducing the nucleation effect of the polar components, while also simultaneously "covering up" themselves with heavy polars, negating the nucleation effects of the inherent SiO2. This could be a very interesting interplay, but the authors must in the final analysis decide how they wish to interpret the data. (Of course the opposite effect is paradoxically observed in the rheology..)
我们认为质量平衡的影响在本次试验中微乎其微，硅原子从体积流体中有效地隔离了重质极性物质，减小了极性组分成核效应，但是也用重组分的极性覆盖自身，忽略了二氧化硅本身的成核效应。这是一个非常有意思的相互影响作用，但是作者必须在最后的分析里决定如何解释这些数据。


见到英文文献就像翻译下，
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2016-04-28 15:43:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Roger杰 的主题更新
21/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭