24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chenxiangmo

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 40.5
帖子: 5
在线: 42.6小时
虫号: 3010830
注册: 2014-03-02
专业: 控制理论与方法

[交流] 各位前辈指导一下，被拒了，但是给出了被拒的理由，各位看看我应该怎么处理？已有4人参与

各位前辈指导一下，被拒了，但是给出了被拒的理由，各位看看我应该怎么处理？

是修改重投，还是改投？修改重投要不要写个说明，或者给编辑回信？拒我的编辑正好是我这个方向上的大牛，引用了他4篇文章，而且拒的有点不客气的感觉

Comments from the associate editor:

This submission discusses an application of XXX systems to the modelling and control of an air conditioning system.

Unfortunately, the papers suffers from the following major drawbacks:

- According to the introduction, the paper contains a substantial generalisation of XXX systems. Generalisations in Sections 3-4 are, however, unclear, if any. Most importantly, they lead to system (16) which is still in the XXX form.

- The air conditioning model in Section 5 is very simple. Furthermore, as far as I understand, a very basic state-feedback controller has been used. How it has been tuned? Why the author did not use MPC, which is the standard for XXX systems? Overall, the impact of the paper in the field of energy efficiency for buildings seems limited.

- The paper contains several unclear sentences. For instance, in the introduction: "Althogh there are many models of XXX systems for these applications, these instances are based only on some specified objects. No lecture proposes a universal modelling and controlling to fit many fields, moreover, extends the framework in theotical research."

Overall, I therefore think the paper is not suitable for publication in XXX(期刊名).

回复此楼