24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1313  |  回复: 6

chenxiangmo

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 各位前辈指导一下,被拒了,但是给出了被拒的理由,各位看看我应该怎么处理? 已有4人参与

各位前辈指导一下,被拒了,但是给出了被拒的理由,各位看看我应该怎么处理?

是修改重投,还是改投?修改重投要不要写个说明,或者给编辑回信?拒我的编辑正好是我这个方向上的大牛,引用了他4篇文章,而且拒的有点不客气的感觉

Comments from the associate editor:

This submission discusses an application of XXX systems to the modelling and control of an air conditioning system.

Unfortunately, the papers suffers from the following major drawbacks:

- According to the introduction, the paper contains a substantial generalisation of XXX systems. Generalisations in Sections 3-4 are, however, unclear, if any. Most importantly, they lead to system (16) which is still in the XXX form.

- The air conditioning model in Section 5 is very simple. Furthermore, as far as I understand, a very basic state-feedback controller has been used. How it has been tuned? Why the author did not use MPC, which is the standard for XXX systems? Overall, the impact of the paper in the field of energy efficiency for buildings seems limited.

- The paper contains several unclear sentences. For instance, in the introduction: "Althogh there are many models of XXX systems for these applications, these instances are based only on some specified objects. No lecture proposes a universal modelling and controlling to fit many fields, moreover, extends the framework in theotical research."

Overall, I therefore  think the paper is not suitable for publication in XXX(期刊名).
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ieem

木虫 (文坛精英)

www.ieem.org


自私的猫1988: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-04-21 23:04:30
应该是编辑没有送审就拒了。拒稿一般不会客气。。。
2楼2016-04-21 18:30:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nwu_eact

铜虫 (小有名气)


自私的猫1988: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-04-21 23:04:47
都是事先准备好的模板,不用理他啊,继续改投他刊

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2016-04-21 18:34:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenxiangmo

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by ieem at 2016-04-21 18:30:09
应该是编辑没有送审就拒了。拒稿一般不会客气。。。

对,编辑直接拒搞的,有何高见,接下来怎么办
4楼2016-04-21 21:07:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenxiangmo

新虫 (初入文坛)

接下来怎么办啊,各位
5楼2016-05-30 22:00:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kigeon

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
给的建议ms挺中肯,先改进再投其它刊物呗

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
6楼2016-05-30 23:46:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

outside_chen

新虫 (小有名气)

7楼2016-05-31 00:34:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 chenxiangmo 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 01:49 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +5 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:47 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:47 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[找工作] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:36 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[论文投稿] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:25 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-30 01:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[公派出国] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-30 01:12 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +16 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-30 00:59 by winsaint
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +4 349506619 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 22:41 by alongwaytogo
[基金申请] 国社科申报系统有变化 +3 kynobel 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-29 21:57 by 余韵清
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +8 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 16/800 2026-08-29 20:45 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +9 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 9/450 2026-08-29 14:41 by hustersqt
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +3 myrtle 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-27 10:01 by angelyueyi
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见