| 查看: 2666 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 lshong 的 6 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
physics of plasma 投稿意见分析
|
|||
|
我投了一篇Physics of plasma，审稿人意见回来说的很严重，感觉几乎就等于是拒稿，编辑部建议转投，但说也可以修改后再看。我想问问大家投过这个期刊的，返回来的审稿意见是怎么样的？是不是说的都是这么严重？ Editorial Office Comments: We have received the referee's report on your paper. The referee's comments indicate that the paper is not appropriate for publication. You may consider revising your manuscript for submission to another journal or to AIP Advances, as described below. Alternatively, you may choose to revise your manuscript to address the referee's concerns. If you do, you must submit a detailed response to the referee along with the revised manuscript. The revised manuscript is due by 25-Apr-2016 via the PXP web site. The Editors will then make the decision on the next step in the review process. Reviewer Comments: The paper presents nice photos of the evolution of ejected plasmas. However, there are major issues. The velocity is ~10^3 m/s, so it is a hydrodynamic development that has nothing to do with spark gap switching or trigger. I do not understand why in fig. 2 the triggering pulse is shown and how the pulse energy is adapted (maybe it helps to give the values of C and R). Fig. 3 is the worst of all. It shows an oscilatory voltage and current that are 90 degrees out of phase. So, for both reasons the dissipated energy beyond 2 microseconds is zero! In the first 2 microseconds the dissipation is roughly 1kV*10A*2us=20 mJ! Orders of magnitude below what the authors give. So I have no clue of what is going on in the pulse circuit. This makes it impossible to properly judge the results. The authors do not even try to give conclusions, they only present a summary. This material should be presented at conferences where it should be thoroughly discussed in order to get good physics in the description. A total rewrite is necessary to get this work to the level of a paper. |
回复此楼» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
sharenzhayan» 猜你喜欢
281求调剂（0805）
已经有8人回复
-
环境领域全国重点实验室招收博士1-2名
已经有3人回复
-
材料专硕306英一数二
已经有10人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学化学工艺专业（081702）315分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
26博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
268求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
被我言中：新模板不强调格式了，假专家开始管格式了
已经有4人回复
3楼2018-10-02 19:27:09
