24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2876  |  回复: 2
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 lshong 的 6 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lshong

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] physics of plasma 投稿意见分析

我投了一篇Physics of plasma,审稿人意见回来说的很严重,感觉几乎就等于是拒稿,编辑部建议转投,但说也可以修改后再看。我想问问大家投过这个期刊的,返回来的审稿意见是怎么样的?是不是说的都是这么严重?

Editorial Office Comments:
     We have received the referee's report on your paper. The referee's comments indicate that the paper is not appropriate for publication. You may consider revising your manuscript for submission to another journal or to AIP Advances, as described below.
     Alternatively, you may choose to revise your manuscript to address the referee's concerns. If you do, you must submit a detailed response to the referee along with the revised manuscript. The revised manuscript is due by 25-Apr-2016 via the PXP web site. The Editors will then make the decision on the next step in the review process.

Reviewer Comments:
    The paper presents nice photos of the evolution of ejected plasmas. However, there are major issues. The velocity is ~10^3 m/s, so it is a hydrodynamic development that has nothing to do with spark gap switching or trigger.
    I do not understand why in fig. 2 the triggering pulse is shown and how the pulse energy is adapted (maybe it helps to give the values of C and R).
    Fig. 3 is the worst of all. It shows an oscilatory voltage and current that are 90 degrees out of phase. So, for both reasons the dissipated energy beyond 2 microseconds is zero! In the first 2 microseconds the dissipation is roughly 1kV*10A*2us=20 mJ! Orders of magnitude below what the authors give. So I have no clue of what is going on in the pulse circuit. This makes it impossible to properly judge the results.
    The authors do not even try to give conclusions, they only present a summary. This material should be presented at conferences where it should be thoroughly discussed in order to get good physics in the description.
    A total rewrite is necessary to get this work to the level of a paper.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sharenzhayan

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
送红花一朵
请问楼主一审结果出来用了多久呢
3楼2018-10-02 19:27:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 04:41 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[考研] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 7lpolszZVXgi 2026-08-14 6/300 2026-08-15 04:21 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 04:17 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 k0dTPqJtl0jt 2026-08-14 4/200 2026-08-15 01:28 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 HFw0lei2R37i 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-15 00:16 by 4wMiSEwB6436
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 22/1100 2026-08-14 23:45 by Noways
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +23 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 49/2450 2026-08-14 20:02 by zhaifei
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +6 majunge000 2026-08-11 8/400 2026-08-14 14:44 by 医学老男孩
[硕博家园] 请教兼职经验 +3 是阿文鸭 2026-08-09 3/150 2026-08-14 12:07 by HER12025
[基金申请] filecode +15 documentary 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-14 10:08 by kissu88
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +10 家与远方 2026-08-10 15/750 2026-08-14 02:08 by 绵羊哥哥
[硕博家园] 一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗 +3 mbygzh 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-13 19:31 by 龙-樱
[基金申请] Filecode 又变了,巨变 +3 WH3796 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 14:13 by 小木虫6752397
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 19:25 by Tide man
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 据悉今年马上要出结果了 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 12:42 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
信息提示
请填处理意见