| 查看: 2612 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 lshong 的 6 个金币 | |||
[交流]
physics of plasma 投稿意见分析
|
|||
|
我投了一篇Physics of plasma,审稿人意见回来说的很严重,感觉几乎就等于是拒稿,编辑部建议转投,但说也可以修改后再看。我想问问大家投过这个期刊的,返回来的审稿意见是怎么样的?是不是说的都是这么严重? Editorial Office Comments: We have received the referee's report on your paper. The referee's comments indicate that the paper is not appropriate for publication. You may consider revising your manuscript for submission to another journal or to AIP Advances, as described below. Alternatively, you may choose to revise your manuscript to address the referee's concerns. If you do, you must submit a detailed response to the referee along with the revised manuscript. The revised manuscript is due by 25-Apr-2016 via the PXP web site. The Editors will then make the decision on the next step in the review process. Reviewer Comments: The paper presents nice photos of the evolution of ejected plasmas. However, there are major issues. The velocity is ~10^3 m/s, so it is a hydrodynamic development that has nothing to do with spark gap switching or trigger. I do not understand why in fig. 2 the triggering pulse is shown and how the pulse energy is adapted (maybe it helps to give the values of C and R). Fig. 3 is the worst of all. It shows an oscilatory voltage and current that are 90 degrees out of phase. So, for both reasons the dissipated energy beyond 2 microseconds is zero! In the first 2 microseconds the dissipation is roughly 1kV*10A*2us=20 mJ! Orders of magnitude below what the authors give. So I have no clue of what is going on in the pulse circuit. This makes it impossible to properly judge the results. The authors do not even try to give conclusions, they only present a summary. This material should be presented at conferences where it should be thoroughly discussed in order to get good physics in the description. A total rewrite is necessary to get this work to the level of a paper. |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
一般major revision多久返回修改稿比较好
已经有9人回复
申请人才类项目太难了
已经有6人回复
我今年中了国家面上项目,今年如能评上副高,面上项目就可以用于下一次评正高了,爽!
已经有9人回复
手机最先摧毁的,是底层家庭的孩子。
已经有4人回复
怎么除去DMF
已经有6人回复
为什么要没事生两个孩子?!
已经有10人回复
陶瓷流延浆料的除泡
已经有3人回复
25年的长江上会通知
已经有4人回复
电气方向,SCI 四区,审稿快、容易中的期刊
已经有5人回复
Elsevier期刊CCL,In Press, Journal Pre-proof一个多月了正常吗,多久才能proof?
已经有4人回复
![]() |
2楼2016-03-29 11:35:47
3楼2018-10-02 19:27:09










回复此楼
sharenzhayan