| ²é¿´: 347 | »Ø¸´: 3 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
xuwei0909ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
DFIX¼ÓÇâºóµÄBºÍC´íÎóÔõô½â¾ö?
|
||
|
ÀûÓÃÕâÁ½¸öÖ¸Áî¼ÓÇâºó²úÉúÈçÏÂBºÍC´íÎó¸ÃÈçºÎ½â¾ö? DFIX 0.85 0.01 O1 H1W1 O1 H1W2 O2 H2W1 O2 H2W2 O3 H3W1 O3 H3W2 O4 H4W1 O4 H4W2 DFIX 1.35 0.02 H1W1 H1W2 H2W1 H2W2 H3W1 H3W2 H4W1 H4W2 Alert level B PLAT731_ALERT_1_B Bond Calc 0.85(5), Rep 0.850(10) ...... 5.00 su-Ra O3 -H3W1 1.555 1.555 PLAT731_ALERT_1_B Bond Calc 0.84(5), Rep 0.844(10) ...... 5.00 su-Ra O4 -H4W1 1.555 1.555 Alert level C PLAT731_ALERT_1_C Bond Calc 0.85(3), Rep 0.845(10) ...... 3.00 su-Ra O4 -H4W2 1.555 1.555 PLAT732_ALERT_1_C Angle Calc 106(10), Rep 106(3) ...... 3.33 su-Ra H1W1 -O1 -H1W2 1.555 1.555 1.555 |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ¼¼ÊõÑо¿ÔºÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§¡¢ÉúÎï¡¢²ÄÁÏ¡¢·ÄÖ¯¡¢»úеµÈרҵµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
̨ÖÝѧԺÓÐÐò¶à¿×²ÄÁÏÍŶӻ¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Ë¶Ê¿ÕÐÉú£¬ÇëËÙÁªÏµ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÎÞ»ú»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ119È˻ظ´
Ê×¶¼Ê¦·¶´óѧ»¯Ñ§ÏµÌïÑó¿ÎÌâ×éר˶Õе÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¹ãÖÝ´óѧ´óÍåÇø»·¾³Ñо¿Ôº»·¾³´ó·Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏÑо¿ËùÍõƽɽ½ÌÊÚÍÅ¶Ó 2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú¼òÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Ìì½òÀí¹¤´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
̨ÖÝѧԺÓÐÐò¶à¿×²ÄÁÏÍŶÓ×îºó³å´Ì£¬Í¬Ñ§ÃDZð´í¹ýŶ£¬ÇëËÙÁªÏµ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
½Î÷¿Æ¼¼Ê¦·¶´óѧÎïÀí»¯Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×é½ÓÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú£¬Ãû¶î»¹ÓУ¬ËÙÀ´
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
xi2004
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- CMEI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 125 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 16769.9
- É¢½ð: 12393
- ºì»¨: 221
- Ìû×Ó: 4161
- ÔÚÏß: 436.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 354550
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-24
- רҵ: ½á¹¹»¯Ñ§
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
xuwei0909(½ð±Ò+10,VIP+0):лл!!!
xuwei0909(½ð±Ò+10,VIP+0):лл!!!
|
×îºó²»ÓÃDFIX, ¸Ä³ÉAFIX 3 ÔõÑù? »òÕß DFIX 0.85 0.02 ÊÔÊÔ |

2Â¥2008-10-19 18:35:28
xuwei0909
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.115
- ½ð±Ò: 13326.7
- É¢½ð: 15
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1998
- ÔÚÏß: 191.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 205156
- ×¢²á: 2006-03-03
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
3Â¥2008-10-20 20:10:14
xi2004
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- CMEI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 125 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 16769.9
- É¢½ð: 12393
- ºì»¨: 221
- Ìû×Ó: 4161
- ÔÚÏß: 436.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 354550
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-24
- רҵ: ½á¹¹»¯Ñ§
|
½âÊÍÔÚÕâÀï. PLAT731 Type_1 Test for consistency of Bond su's and Coordinate su's in CIF A large ratio of the reported and calculated bond s.u.'s is found. The use of a DFIX instruction might cause such a warning since calculated s.u.'s are based on reported variances only. Note_1: su's on the unitcell dimensions are taken into account in the calculation of expected su's. This may result in large differences between expected and reported su's when this contribution is not included in the reported su's, in particular for inaccurate unitcells. Note_2: Another source for the discrepancy between calculated and reported su's can be that the validation software has access only to the variances of the refined parameters as opposed to the full co-variance matrix used by e.g. SHELXL for the calculation of derived parameters with associated su's. Constrained/restrained refinement may cause largei co-variances. Äã˵µÄ¿ÉÄÜÊÇ DFIX 0.85 0.02 ²»ÐаÉ? »òÐí¿ÉÒÔÔÙµ÷µ÷ 0.02 Õâ¸öÊýÖµ È¥µô DFIX ¸Ä³É AFIX 3 ÊÔ¹ýÂð? »¹ÓÐÄãµÄµ¥°ûÆ«²î¶ÔÂð? |

4Â¥2008-10-20 21:28:58














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥